<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BEYOND 4G &#187; 4G LTE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beyond4g.org/category/lte/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beyond4g.org</link>
	<description>Telcom Research and News Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:01:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>India Telecom Update 1H-2010</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/india-telecom-update-1h-2010</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/india-telecom-update-1h-2010#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 08:52:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G Presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=1247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[India telecom update 1 h 2010v0.1 View more presentations from bramnha. Download Presentation : India Telecom Update 1H 2010v0.1]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="__ss_5550432" style="width: 425px;"><strong style="display: block; margin: 12px 0 4px;"><a title="India telecom update 1 h 2010v0.1" href="http://www.slideshare.net/bramnha/india-telecom-update-1-h-2010v01">India telecom update 1 h 2010v0.1</a></strong><object id="__sse5550432" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=indiatelecomupdate1h2010v0-1-101025034101-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=india-telecom-update-1-h-2010v01&amp;userName=bramnha" /><param name="name" value="__sse5550432" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="__sse5550432" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=indiatelecomupdate1h2010v0-1-101025034101-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=india-telecom-update-1-h-2010v01&amp;userName=bramnha" name="__sse5550432" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<div style="padding: 5px 0 12px;">View more <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/">presentations</a> from <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/bramnha">bramnha</a>.</div>
</div>
<p>Download Presentation : <a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/India-Telecom-Update-1H-2010v0.1.pdf">India Telecom Update 1H 2010v0.1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/india-telecom-update-1h-2010/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LTE – Mid Year Review Infrastructure, 1H 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/lte-%e2%80%93-mid-year-review-infrastructure-1h-2010</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/lte-%e2%80%93-mid-year-review-infrastructure-1h-2010#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/lte-%e2%80%93-mid-year-review-infrastructure-1h-2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BP Tiwari As we approach the middle of 2010, then, it&#8217;s worthwhile revisiting the state of the LTE global network deployment. Operators are still looking for vendors with solutions that allow LTE to be launched as an overlay or as part of a 2G/3G network renewal. Th ey&#8217;re still looking to pair LTE launches with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BP Tiwari</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/blog1.png"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1222" title="blog1" src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/blog1-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>As we approach the middle of 2010, then, it&#8217;s worthwhile revisiting the state of the LTE global network deployment.</p>
<p>Operators are still looking for vendors with solutions that allow LTE to be launched as an overlay or as part  of a 2G/3G network renewal. Th ey&#8217;re still looking to pair LTE launches with new applications and services (including voice, some day).<span id="more-1216"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The positioning of 4G has been a real point of debate among operators. Last week MetroPCS has launched world&#8217;s first LTE commercial handsets on its new LTE network with positioning as new 4G service against its 3G with unlimited data, text, voice, Video and new content agreements with real etc. We witnessed Sprint doing something similar with their new WiMAX based 4G core. We saw high average data consumption at Clearwire (currently at 7 GB/mo) – clearly a precursor of what&#8217;s to come with new 4G networks.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/092610_1735_LTEMidYear1.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Alcatel Lucent, Huawei, Ericsson , NSN ,Samsung and ZTE are competing to become market leaders in LTE based 4G Infrastructure. <span style="color: #231f20; font-family: Arial; font-size: 10pt;">However</span>, it&#8217;s much too early to translate commercial or trial reference numbers into clear indications of market leadership – though they may well support mind share leadership.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/092610_1735_LTEMidYear2.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Source: Current Analysis</p>
<p><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>LTE Early Deployments and Market Drivers</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In any new market, the first commercial deployments are always highly scrutinized; they provide insights into how a technology works, what it can deliver, its state of maturity, and how future launches can be improved. LTE is no different, meaning all eyes will be on launches in the Nordics (Telia Sonera), North America (Verizon Wireless, Metro PCS) and Asia (DoCoMo, KDDI).</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Data Cards and Dongles.</strong> Talk with any operator or vendor involved with LTE and you will hear the technology positioned as a solution for addressing growing mobile traffic to PCs, laptops, smartphones, featurephones, consumer electronics, sensors and everything in between. For the next year, however, data cards and USB dongles will dominate usage, based on the relative lack of device diversity in the early days of a market along with early users focused primarily on laptop and netbook data access.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Data Services.</strong> Th e focus of early LTE device availability on data devices (axiomatic of any new mobile broadband technology) implies that early services will focus on data. More specifically, it implies that despite operator and vendor eff orts to standardize voice delivery over LTE networks, voice services won&#8217;t be an integral part of most LTE off ers for the next 12 months or so. Where they are, they will come thanks to existing 2G/3G coverage and CS fallback.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>North America &amp; Asia.</strong> The Nordics may have enjoyed the world&#8217;s first commercial LTE services, but broader momentum will first register in North America and Asia. Credit relatively new HSPA (and HSPA+) networks in Europe and Latin America along with relatively recent (or future) spectrum availability that will make commercial LTE in markets like Europe, and India a medium to long-term proposition.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Biz Model Explorations.</strong> Where LTE services (trial, commercial or otherwise) are launched, operators will leverage the opportunity to test out their assumptions around the technology from a business perspective. How will users react to policy decisions around usage caps? What applications will dominate usage? How will LTE free capacity (or drive usage) on 2G and 3G networks? Will indoor vs. outdoor usage patterns mimic 2G and 3G? We are already seeing these details from the early experience of TeliaSonera; and more of these findings – benefitting from a greater sample of users – will follow.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">Operators Buying Criteria</span></strong></p>
<p>Operators planning on LTE deployments in the near-term need to query their network vendors on their support for voice thanks to circuit-switched fallback (CSFB). Where the IMS-based VOLTE has become the de facto LTE voice plan for the industry, it&#8217;s not going to be a near-term option for most operators. Few vendors, however, have done much to highlight their CSFB capabilities or commercial solutions – making it key for operators to verify them.</p>
<p>• Like any new mobile broadband technology, data devices will dominate initial LTE launches. For LTE to become the mass-market success operators envision for it, the technology needs to move beyond PC cards and dongles. Speeding this process will require operators to make their demands well known, working closely with vendors to drive supply.</p>
<p>• Operators need to consider leveraging LTE launches to introduce new policy tools into their business. EV-DO, HSPA and HSPA+ launches have taught the market that fully monetizing mobile broadband services will require new ways of charging for usage, throttling usage and offerring tiered experiences. It may be diffi cult to add these new policies on top of existing services – making the launch of new network like LTE a logical starting point.</p>
<p>• WiMAX operators may to consider TD-LTE as a future network evolution. With vendors reiterating their commitment to 802.16m, there&#8217;s no need for operators to worry that WiMAX as a technology will cease to advance. Regardless, broad mobile operator interest virtually ensures that LTE will enjoy scale and ecosystem efficiencies over WiMAX – with TD-LTE offering a solution for WiMAX operator unpaired spectrum assets. To this end, it makes sense for operators to hedge their bets with solutions and vendors that can support both technologies.</p>
<p>Dowload PDF : <a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/LTE-Mid-Year-Review.pdf">LTE- Mid Year Review</a></p>
<p><em>( View expressed here are my own and does not reflect my employers opinion )</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/lte-%e2%80%93-mid-year-review-infrastructure-1h-2010/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DoCoMo aiming to reverse the decline of Aggregate ARPU through continued increase in packet ARPU</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/docomo-aiming-to-reverse-the-decline-of-aggregate-arpu-through-continued-increase-in-packet-arpu</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/docomo-aiming-to-reverse-the-decline-of-aggregate-arpu-through-continued-increase-in-packet-arpu#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LTE Operators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/docomo-aiming-to-reverse-the-decline-of-aggregate-arpu-through-continued-increase-in-packet-arpu</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the recent years, the ARPU from voice service has been declining due to the factors of discounted services and shorter phone calls. DOCOMO has seen downward trend in aggregate ARPU and is planning to offset this by taking steps to increase packet ARPU. In FY 2010, the ARPU from packet service is expected to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: black;"><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/docomo2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1186" title="docomo" src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/docomo2-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>In the recent years, the ARPU from voice service has been declining due to the factors of discounted services and shorter phone calls. DOCOMO has seen downward trend in aggregate ARPU and is planning to offset this by taking steps to increase packet ARPU. In FY 2010, the ARPU from packet service is expected to surpass voice ARPU. To strengthen packet based services and reverse downtrend of aggregate ARPU, DoCoMo is planning to promote usage of flat-rate service.  In FY 2009, the revenues from voice declined 12.9% year-on-year and <span id="more-1155"></span>aggregate ARPU declined 6.3% year-on-year. Packet revenue grew 2.9% year-on year and expected to surpass voice ARPU in FY, 2010. DOCOMO is aiming to increase packet ARPU by 4.5% in FY 2010.<br />
</span></p>
<p><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/072510_1618_DoCoMoaimin23.png" alt="" /><span style="color: black;"><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #9bbb59;">In FY 2010, revenue from data is expected to reach $ 29.30 surpassing voice ARPU of 29.10.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: black;"><strong>Initiatives to strengthen Data Services by introduction of Flat Rate Service:</strong> DoCoMo has taken initiatives to expand its packet usage to offset declining Voice ARPU by promoting monthly flat rate services like i-mode. I-mode packet service allows monthly flat rate which varies in accordance with monthly usage. The operator in July 2009, as well introduced a flat rate data plan for data cards to enhance its data services. It aims to increase packet flat rate subscription by more than 6 million to reach 31.70 million subscriptions in FY10, i.e. 63% of total consumers.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: black;"><strong>Promote packet communications by enhanced services and content: </strong>DoCoMo is working to expand its lineup services and content. The operator will take steps to expand subscriptions and usage among a broad range of customers by expanding to areas closely linked to lifestyles, such as tourism and health care. Mobile phone usage is expanding rapidly with the availability of higher speed networks and more advanced handsets, but most of the video content that is available for handsets user is not optimized to smaller screens. DOCOMO is moving ahead with development of content that suits well for mobile phones and smaller screens ( about 3 to 4 inch). BeeTV launched in May, 2009 was one of those initiatives. DOCOMO is developing handsets functions which would be more suitable for replaying videos and other contents by introducing inline Flash.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: black;"><strong>Promote smart phone adoptions to strengthen data services. </strong>The market strategy of promoting smart phones with advanced functions rivaling those of mobile PC&#8217;s, such as general purpose operating systems, Internet connections capabilities, schedule managers, and personnel information management, as well as PC data cards, is positioned as an important part of efforts to expand packet ARPU. DOCOMO, principally targeting enterprise demand to strengthen its promotion of smart phones and data cards for PCs.<strong><br />
</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="color: black;"><strong>Initiatives of more advanced networks by introducing LTE: </strong>In 2009, DOCOMO introduced HSUPA services, which has the capability to deliver maximum uplink transmission rate of 5.7 Mbps . DOCOMO plans to launch LTE based services in December 2010. It aims to install nearly 1000 Base Station in FY 2010. The rollout will be progressive with high demand areas (Tokyo, Osaka, Nagoya) will be covered first using an overlay approach with existing 3G areas.  Downlink speeds up to 37.5 Mbps will be offered at the time of launch. DOCOMO plans to introduce data devices first and smart phones are scheduled in 2011.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/072510_1618_DoCoMoaimin43.png" alt="" /><span style="color: black;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/072510_1618_DoCoMoaimin53.png" alt="" /><span style="color: #9bbb59;"><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #9bbb59;">In FY 2010, DOCOMO will Launch LTE in high demand areas (Tokyo, Osaka and Nagoya). It aims to install 1000 Base Stations in FY 2010<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/072510_1618_DoCoMoaimin63.png" alt="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/docomo-aiming-to-reverse-the-decline-of-aggregate-arpu-through-continued-increase-in-packet-arpu/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enabling reuse-1 in 4G Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/enabling-reuse-1-in-4g-networks</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/enabling-reuse-1-in-4g-networks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 14:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G WiMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical Article]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=1124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New generation 4G systems like LTE and WIMAX is designed to support frequency reuse-1 mechanisms to enable a universal frequency reuse pattern providing operators with best achievable use of their valuable spectrum. Ever increasing interest is shown by companies and operators to find mechanisms to allow reuse1 deployments. This article will cover one of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/test2.png"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1125" title="test2" src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/test2-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>New generation 4G systems like LTE and WIMAX is designed to support frequency reuse-1 mechanisms to enable a universal frequency reuse pattern providing operators with best achievable use of their valuable spectrum. Ever increasing interest is shown by companies and operators to find mechanisms to allow reuse1 deployments. This article will cover one of the key enabling technologies i.e. ICIC and its application in allowing universal use of Reuse 1 networks.</p>
<p><span id="more-1124"></span>OFDMA based 4G networks can support reuse one deployment through the use of;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 36pt;">• Ability to power control and vary the coding rate of control channel;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 36pt;">• Fractional power control with coordination with controller based overload control messages in UL;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 36pt;">• Support of very low code rates;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 36pt;">• Incremental redundancy based HARQ;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 36pt;">• DL and UL ICIC further enhance single cell frequency reuse;</p>
<p style="margin-left: 36pt;">• Multi-Antenna techniques.</p>
<p>One of the key goals is to increase spectral efficiency and overall SINR of the system. However, users at the cell edge are particularly susceptible to increased interference resulting in reduced throughput due to higher transmit powers required and inter-cell interference. Therefore Interference coordination as methods to reduce inter cell interference is gaining momentum and industry attention.<span style="color: #4f81bd;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/070110_1430_Enablingreu1.png" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #4f81bd;">Figure 1: Intercell interference scenarios<br />
</span></p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Fractional Frequency Reuse</span></h2>
<p>: In its simplest form is Fractional frequency re-use (FFR) implements a reuse scheme-n (n &gt; 1) system. A reuse-n system partitions a geographical area into n regions, each of which is exclusively allocated to a  band in such a way that cells physically close to each other are assigned with different bands to avoid dominant ICI. Cells that are sufficiently far from each other may reuse the same band, and how frequently the reuse is practiced is dictated by the reuse factor n. For instance, n = 3 if the same band is reused every three cells. However, segmenting frequency re-use suffers from reduced spectral efficiency.</p>
<p>Therefore FFR in 4G systems(LTE and WIMAX) tries to define a sweet spot where the cell center of neighboring cells share the same band, while their cell edge are separate on orthogonal bands. Besides, the cell-center and cell-edge bands in neighboring cells are non-overlapping. The colour on the spectrum is shown to match the colour of the geographical area.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/070110_1430_Enablingreu2.png" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #4f81bd;">Figure 2: Illustration of Fractional Frequency Reuse<br />
</span></p>
<h1><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Possible ICIC implementation in LTE<br />
</span></h1>
<h2><span style="font-size: 12pt;">ICIC in downlink</span></h2>
<p><span style="color: black;">Two common implementations that will be supported for Downlink ICIC are static and semi-static. Static ICIC is initially planned which also includes the need for some level of system planning. Semi-static ICIC utilizes an event triggered message (RNTP) over the X2 interface and reduces the system planning impact. Relative Narrowband Tx Power (RNTP) is transmitted when the Tx power exceeds a specified threshold. The frequency of the RNTP transmission is limited to no more than 200 ms to prevent overload of messaging.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #002060;"><strong>DL Static ICIC implementation: </strong></span><span style="color: black;">Figure 3 shows the concept of DL ICIC using inverted Reuse scheme. Some restricted PRBs (also called non-preferred frequency zones) are defined per each cell and the base stations transmit at a certain constant nominal power across the entire bandwidth except for those restricted PRBs. The restricted PRBs can be transmitted at a lower power (e.g. 10 dB lower than the nonrestricted PRBs) which results in a soft fractional frequency reuse scheme or there may not be any transmissions at all in the restricted PRBs which results in a hard fractional frequency reuse scheme.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;">Each cell can then schedule its cell edge users in the restricted PRBs of its closest neighbor and hence they can realise an improved SINR as the neighboring cell is  transmitting with a lower power or not transmitting at all on those PRBs. The classification of users is done in two groups: cell inner users and cell edge users. Reporting of the users can be done based on some metrics such as path loss for UL or CQI reporting for DL<span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS; font-size: 9pt;">.<br />
</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/070110_1430_Enablingreu3.png" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #4f81bd;">Figure 3: Downlink ICIC static implementation<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<h2><span style="font-size: 12pt;">ICIC in uplink</span></h2>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span><span style="color: black;">Two implementations also exist for Uplink ICIC. Static ICIC includes the need for some level of system planning. Semi-static ICIC utilizes an event triggered message (HII and OI) over the X2 interface and reduces the system planning impact. High Interference Indicator (HII) and Overload Indicator (OI) are event triggered messages. HII is sent indicating the PRBs and subbands where the serving cell intends on scheduling cell edge UEs and thereby causing high interference. OI is sent indicating low, medium, or high interference levels. Care needs to be taken when utilizing ICIC in a multi-vendor eNB environment, as the behavior of the eNB is implementation specific when receiving ICIC related indicators.<br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/070110_1430_Enablingreu4.png" alt="" /><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><br />
</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #4f81bd;">Figure 4: Uplink ICIC implementation<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #002060;"><strong>DL Static ICIC implementation: </strong></span><span style="font-family: Trebuchet MS; font-size: 9pt;">In the uplink, the main idea is to concentrate all interference in specific portions of the </span><span style="color: black;">bandwidth, known as the Trash Heap. Figure 4 shows the concept of the Trash Heap which consists in designating a portion of the bandwidth in each cell to bear the brunt of the interference from neighboring cells. As for DL, the users are classified in two groups, inner cell and cell edge users, using a any algorithm based on CQI reports for DL and path loss estimation for UL. And as for DL, the soft fractional frequency reuse concept is applied and included in the concept of Trash Heap. For cell edge mobiles, the uplink scheduler will assign resources in the Trash Heap of the mobile&#8217;s strongest neighbouring cell, which is identified by event triggered reporting. If the scheduler needs to assign the mobile outside the Trash Heap, it does so with a reduced transmit power spectral density (PSD) level, which is implemented through an absolute power control command in the UL scheduling grant. <strong><em>The idea here is to concentrate the bulk of the inter-cell interference in a small portion of the total bandwidth, thereby preventing the majority of the users from getting impacted by this interference which is now localized to certain sub-carriers.<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<h2><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Possible ICIC implementation in WiMAX</span></h2>
<p><span style="color: black;">WiMAX Release 1.0 allows reuse 1 deployments, however most of the commercial systems are deployed in reuse3. The initial implementation of WiMAX in reuse 1 will be realized by FFR based techniques. Specific implementation of FFR techniques is presented in <a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/WiMAX-1.5-for-operators-v2.pdf">WIMAX 1.5</a> and <a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/whitepaper-state-and-opportunity-of-broadband-in-india">WiMAX 2.0 papers.</a><br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;">The effect of inter-cell interference in reuse 1 systems of WiMAx results in MAP and traffic performance degradation especially in cell edge areas. Interference mitigation technique is needed to alleviate the cell edge performance degradation. Inter-Cell Interference Coordination (ICIC) may be used as the key technique for making reuse 1 work better.</span><span style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 18pt;"><br />
</span><span style="color: black;">ICIC implementation in WiMAX is possible with signaling information exchanges within Base stations over R8 interfaces.<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;">Possible implementation of ICIC in downlink:<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;">The WiMAX systems can implement DL ICIC to solve DL inter-cell interference problem in reuse 1 systems.<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;">It can automatically adjusts both frequency usage and Tx power pattern considering interference pattern from neighboring cells<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="color: black;">Edge user throughput is increased by coordinating inter-cell interference which is needed to exchange scheduling information among BSs<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p><span style="color: black;">Possible implementation of ICIC in uplink:<br />
</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: black;">Automatically controls MS Tx power based on load information exchanged among BSs<br />
</span></li>
<li><span style="color: black;">It is needed to exchange scheduling information and measurement reports form MS<br />
</span></li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/070110_1430_Enablingreu5.png" alt="" /><span style="color: black;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #4f81bd;">Figure 5: ICIC implementation in WiMAX<br />
</span></p>
<p>Download PDF Version<span style="color: #c0504d; text-decoration: underline;"><strong> <a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Enabling-reuse-1-in-4G-Networksv0.1.pdf">Enabling reuse 1 in 4G Networksv0.1</a></strong><strong><br />
</strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/enabling-reuse-1-in-4g-networks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LTE spectrum and Deployment Choices for Operators</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/operators-lte-spectrum-and-deployment-choices</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/operators-lte-spectrum-and-deployment-choices#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=1112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global spectrum availability for LTE The initial deployment in LTE is expected in 700 MHz for the US, 2.1 GHz for Japan and 2.6 GHz in Europe. The 2.3/2.5 GHz TDD band for deployment is available in China, India. The new LTE systems will support existing bands of GSM/W-CDMA/HSPA, as most of the devices will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: black; font-size: 12pt;"><strong><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/4G-LTE-Logo.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1117" title="4G-LTE-Logo" src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/4G-LTE-Logo-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Global spectrum availability for LTE</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;">The initial deployment in LTE is expected in 700 MHz for the US, 2.1 GHz for Japan and 2.6 GHz in Europe. The 2.3/2.5 GHz TDD band for deployment is available in China, India. The new LTE systems will support existing bands of GSM/W-CDMA/HSPA, as most of the devices will support multiband operation, and it will allow operators to smoothly introduce LTE services in dense markets and gradually proliferate for a national coverage. A brief update of spectrum availability for LTE is presented below.<span id="more-1112"></span></span><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>United States: </strong>Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in April 2008 auctioned 62 megahertz of spectrum in the 700 MHz band for LTE services. The band is highly prized because the low frequency, as it allows signals to travel farther and provide better in-building coverage than higher frequencies such as 1900 MHz. As a result, operators need fewer base stations to cover an area, which translates into lower overhead costs—a major asset for any operator looking to be aggressive on the pricing front.</p>
<p>Verizon Wireless was the biggest winner in the 700 MHz auction. The other big winner of the spectrum was AT&amp;T. AT&amp;T bid for fewer licenses than Verizon, having won much of the spectrum it wanted in FCC auctions held in 2002 and 2003.</p>
<p><strong>Europe</strong>: Norway, Finland and Sweden auctioned their spectrum in 2007, 2008 and 2009 respectively. This year the Netherlands and Denmark have concluded their 2.6GHz auctions, the auction in Germany is completed and some point during 2010 (France, Spain, Poland, Portugal, Switzerland and Belgium are all expected to hold auctions this year).<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Germany</strong>: A total of 41 spectrum blocks was sold in the auction, in the 800MHz, 1.8GHz, 2GHz and 2.6GHz bands. The three largest mobile operators, O2, Vodafone and Deutsche Telekom&#8217;s T-Mobile, each won two paired 5MHz chunks of spectrum in the 800MHz band, considered key for rural coverage of mobile broadband.<strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>China and India</strong>: 2.3 GHz TDD frequency is recently allocated to 3 operators in India. In china 2.3/2.5 GHz spectrum is available for LTE deployments. Both the spectrum in India and China is TDD type.<span style="color: black;"><strong></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;"><strong>Japan: </strong>In Japan, 2.1 GHz and 1.5 GHz spectrum is available for LTE Deployments. </span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;">Download the full article here&#8230;<a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Operators-LTE-spectrum-and-Deployment-Choicesv0.1.pdf">Operators LTE spectrum and Deployment Choicesv0.1</a><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/operators-lte-spectrum-and-deployment-choices/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s not all over for WiMAX, Indian BWA operators has limited choice and may decide to enter market with WiMAX</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/it%e2%80%99s-not-all-over-for-wimax-bwa-operators-has-limited-choice-and-may-decide-to-enter-with-wimax</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/it%e2%80%99s-not-all-over-for-wimax-bwa-operators-has-limited-choice-and-may-decide-to-enter-with-wimax#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 15:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G WiMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=1079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By BP Tiwari (Beyond4G) The LTE camp is euphoric about Qualcomm wining four circles which further got comprehensive media attention as Reliance controlled Infotel expressed their interest towards LTE. All the other players like Aircell ,Bharti, Augere and Tikona is watching Reliance controlled Infotel&#8217;s move for BWA deployment The WiMAX camp spearheaded by Samsung, Hauwei [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By BP Tiwari <a href="http://www.beyond4g.org">(Beyond4G</a>)</p>
<p><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/061510_1515_Itsnotallov1.gif" alt="" align="left" />The LTE camp is euphoric about Qualcomm wining four circles which further got comprehensive media attention as Reliance controlled Infotel expressed their interest towards LTE. All the other players like Aircell ,Bharti, Augere and  Tikona is watching Reliance controlled Infotel&#8217;s move for BWA deployment</p>
<p>The WiMAX camp spearheaded by Samsung, Hauwei and ZTE will try to convince Infotel for immediate WiMAX deployment to enter market in similar timelines as 3G. The strategy is not impending from the fact that they do not have a LTE roadmap, but rather their eagerness to enter the agreement with Infotel and secure their mobile data business.<span id="more-1079"></span></p>
<p>The companies which are involved in TDD LTE system development are ALU, Ericson, Motorola, Huawei, ZTE, Nokia and Samsung to name few. Huawei has a working trial network in china shanghai, followed by Motorola who has also deployed TDD LTE indoors. Nokia Siemens in a bid to be the part of big LTE ecosystem from China has opened a new lab Hangzhou R&amp;D facility.</p>
<p>Most of the suppliers are working towards ensuring their base stations are ready as early as possible to grab markets share where WiMAX is gaining momentum especially at TDD space in India. In bid to accelerate uptake and proliferation of LTE, suppliers are aggressively developing LTE systems and strengthening ecosystem.   The case of LTE in India is especially promoted by QUALCOMM, Nokia, ALU and Ericsson.</p>
<p>The new BWA operators are midst of this battle of titans who are ensuring their interests in mobile data business in India. In this short article I would like to present my own findings to provide new BWA operators with sufficient data to decide their technology choice and decisions. The data is collected from various research reports, direct discussions and Industry news.</p>
<h2>TDD LTE Base Station availability for India BWA operators</h2>
<p>Supplier who has WiMAX experience and are working for LTE products will become the first to supply LTE TDD trial equipments in Indian market. It is expected that ALU, Motorola and Huawei can quickly demonstrate a working LTE TDD systems followed by Nokia and Ericsson in a quarter or later. Trials are expected to happen in Q4-2010 time-frame. Readiness to ship equipment for mass scale deployment of LTE TDD is not expected to happen before Q1/Q2-2011.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 36pt;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/061510_1515_Itsnotallov2.png" alt="" /><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<h2>LTE TDD Devices Availability</h2>
<p>The most interesting of all is the LTE TDD device ecosystems. Let me report some broad time-lines based on my data which I have captured over period of time talking to industry experts and analysis reports.</p>
<p style="margin-left: 36pt;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/061510_1515_Itsnotallov3.png" alt="" /></p>
<ul>
<li>The commercial availability of chipsets will start as early as Q3, 2010 and most of them would be ready by Q1-2011.</li>
<li>Most reasonably it will at least take one quarter more for ODM&#8217;s to supply finished products i.e. Q2-2011.</li>
<li>We have experienced from wimax that time to complete device interoperability&#8217;s cannot be shortened beyond a specific period of time and hence the devices ecosystem would most likely to be ready by Q2-2011.Only USB dongles are expected in this time frame.</li>
<li>Expect additional one quarter for Indoor Devices</li>
</ul>
<h2>When do we see handsets and Smartphone&#8217;s in LTE TDD?</h2>
<p style="margin-left: 40pt;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/061510_1515_Itsnotallov4.png" alt="" /><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The commercial availability of chipsets for handsets and Smartphone&#8217;s is not expected before Q2- 2011.</li>
<li>Most reasonably it will at least take one to two quarter more for ODM&#8217;s to supply finished products.</li>
<li>It is reasonable to expect readiness of handsets by 2012</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">It is my estimation that most operators will launch their 3G services by November 2010. Four 3G operators per circle are expected to launch services apart from the old mobile data players who are operational with Ev-Do Technology.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">It is critical for BWA operator to launch their mobile data services in similar timelines otherwise the operator will face intense competition and early market entry benefit will be lost.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">If BWA is launched in similar timeline as those in line with 3Goperators the chances of mobile data from BWA technology ( WiMAX today, LTE later ) can succeed in winning a bigger market share.</div>
<p style="text-align: justify; margin-left: 13pt;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/061510_1515_Itsnotallov5.png" alt="" /></p>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">Ability to offer QoS , time and volume based unlimited plans will play an important role is customer behaviors in choosing mobile broadband networks as wireline is very limited in country.</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">It is imperative to launch services before 3G operators or parallel with 3G operators to take that early lead and outperform competition to become market leader.</div>
</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><em>Finally, I have presented that it is reasonable to expect a mature TDD LTE ecosystem evolving around only after Q2-2011 for commercial deployments. Up to this period acquiring customers and retaining market share could be the best strategy for BWA operators. WiMAX could be explored for immediate deployment. It is imperative for BWA operator to start the services in the similar timelines when 3G networks are made available to compete and take the early market entry advantage.  A long term strategy could be centered on or around TDD-LTE with initial deployment happening in WiMAX with migration plan towards LTE TDD. The Migration to LTE can be achieved in phased manner as suppliers are developing LTE products and in most cases it can be seamlessly upgraded with new software&#8217;s and channel cards. Operator can also look to 16m migration which has an added advantage of reusing existing devices.<br />
</em></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/061510_1515_Itsnotallov6.png" alt="" /><strong><em><br />
</em></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em><strong>Note: Views expressed here are my own and by no means reflect my company&#8217;s opinion</strong>. </em>You can ask for more detailed analysis report at <a href="mailto:admin@beyond4g.org">admin@beyond4g.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/it%e2%80%99s-not-all-over-for-wimax-bwa-operators-has-limited-choice-and-may-decide-to-enter-with-wimax/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is LTE capable of enabling new TV experience?</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/is-lte-capable-of-enabling-new-tv-experience</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/is-lte-capable-of-enabling-new-tv-experience#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=1038</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By : BP Tiwari When I first started observing people&#8217;s relationships and routines with television, things were rather straightforward: some people had DVRs while others still used VHS, some downloaded movies from file sharing sites while others bought pirated DVDS or rented from a local shop, some had TV on 24/7 while others consciously limited [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By : BP Tiwari</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/060410_1728_IsLTEcapabl11.png"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1044" title="060410_1728_IsLTEcapabl1" src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/060410_1728_IsLTEcapabl11-150x126.png" alt="" width="150" height="126" /></a>When I first started observing people&#8217;s relationships and routines with television, things were rather straightforward: some people had DVRs while others still used VHS, some downloaded movies from file sharing sites while others bought pirated DVDS or rented from a local shop, some had TV on 24/7 while others consciously limited TV. The lines between TV, PC and mobile phones were rather firmly set with particular types of activities and content adhering to each device, content not typically shifting screens and communication between or among them infrequent or requiring a particular level of technical know-how. Today, as more people adopt new internet-enabled devices and services, people&#8217;s daily media consumption is extending far beyond the reach of the stationary, shared television sets offering TV channels.<span id="more-1038"></span></p>
<p><strong>Often people ask me, what is the base line bandwidth requirement to enable Internet TV? T</strong>he amount of data rate required is dependent on number of factors especially type of video format, frames per second, resolution etc. On high level a standard definition based TV in MPEG 4 format will require at least 2 Mbps or a HD quality video will require an 8 mbps sustained connection.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/060410_1728_IsLTEcapabl2.png" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">And Video does not stop here ….</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/060410_1728_IsLTEcapabl3.png" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The web has completely changed the aspects with introduction of laptops and now with the introduction with Smartphone&#8217;s. But even, today the web has very limited adoption in the premier entertainments devices in your living room, the TV. So we stuck there, there are two completely different world. The one world has all your favorite web videos and your favorite websites, while other has the traditional TV experience.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Ways to provide video service over the 4G Networks<br />
</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong>Unicast</strong> :  Using a unicast services flow based on user request ( and attaching a QoS profile to the services class. ) . Signaling is carried out on every service flow while creating, change or deletion over air interface between BTS and MS. The required air resources increase in proportion with number of users.</p>
<p><strong>Broadcast mode</strong>:  <span style="color: black;">The broadcast mode is a </span>unidirectional point-to-multipoint transmission of multimedia data (e.g. text, audio, picture, video) from a single source entity to all users in a broadcast service area. The broadcast mode is intended to efficiently use radio/network resources e.g. data is transmitted over a common radio channel. Data is transmitted in the broadcast service area as defined by the network (Home environment).</p>
<p><strong>Multicast mode:</strong> The multicast mode allows the unidirectional point-to-multipoint transmission of multimedia data (e.g. text, audio, picture, video) from a single source point to a multicast group in a multicast service area. The multicast mode is intended to efficiently use radio/network resources e.g. data is transmitted over a common radio channel. Data is transmitted in the multicast service area as defined by the network (Home environment). In the multicast mode there is the possibility for the network to selectively transmit to cells within the multicast service area which contain members of a multicast group.</p>
<p>However, whether to implement MBMS or to use Unicast Video for TV services should be carefully studied. I have personally not seen any MBMS commercial network case study yet, and have not heard any network with a committed implementation plan, either. Unicast-based mobile IPTV has commercial business cases and considered to be a more practical solution.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/060410_1728_IsLTEcapabl4.png" alt="" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The unicast based IPTV is expected to be more widely accepted and has immediate takers. The new initiative by Google and their partners like sony,Logitech and intel called Google TV is testimonial to the trend. Mobile broadband networks like LTE and WiMAX will accelerate the adoption on video over internet.  It&#8217;s a fascinating time in TV land. According to Google, more than 4 billion people are TV users. That&#8217;s higher than cell phone and computer users combined. Americans watch TV about 5 hours a day, and spend many more hours on the Internet &#8211; often doing both at the same time.And my guess is, we will see 10X more innovation on the TV in the next five years versus the past decade.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Watch this video featuring Google, Intel, Sony, best buy, Logitech, adobe and dish network CEOs talking about the new internet TV which will be released commercially this fall.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xYXSOaC1xv8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xYXSOaC1xv8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>Suggested Reading;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/change-is-inevitable-and-growth-is-intentional"> Change is inevitable and growth is intentional</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/managing-data-networks">Managing Data Networks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/is-lte-capable-of-enabling-new-tv-experience/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At last 16m unearth supporters, ready to mark its entry against TD-LTE</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/at-last-16m-unearth-supporters-ready-to-mark-its-entry-against-td-lte</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/at-last-16m-unearth-supporters-ready-to-mark-its-entry-against-td-lte#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 06:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G WiMAX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General 4G Broadband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/at-last-16m-unearth-supporters-ready-to-mark-its-entry-against-td-lte</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By BP Tiwari The industry around 4G FDD is clearly evolving towards LTE as major operators committed their plans or intentions to move into LTE. However, the 4G TDD path for LTE is not going to be an easy ride owing to the competition from WiMAX. Most of the current WiMAX deployments are in TDD [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By BP Tiwari</p>
<p><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/052210_0622_Atlast16mun1.png" alt="" align="left" />The industry around 4G FDD is clearly evolving towards LTE as major operators committed their plans or intentions to move into LTE. However, the 4G TDD path for LTE is not going to be an easy ride owing to the competition from WiMAX. Most of the current WiMAX deployments are in TDD and operators would certainly like to recover their investments before migrating to any other evolving technologies in near future.</p>
<p>Operators have also realized that the investments made in building network based on WiMAX TDD cannot be turned in to LTE-TDD overnight even if they like to. Clearwire for instance acquired more than 300k subscriber last quarter marking its entry to 1 Million mobile broadband clubs. If they choose to migrate to LTE, what will happen to those 1M wimax devices? By the time TDD LTE matures clearwire will acquire anywhere between 3 to 5 Million subscribers and upgrading a 5 Million serving WiMAX network to a new TDD LTE RAN might just not be a practical case. I am sure Yota , UQ, Atheeb, Taiwanese WiMAX operators and new WiMAX deployments expected in India would also face with similar dilemma.<span id="more-1024"></span></p>
<p>It appears like operators too has recognized the fact and asked leading 16e suppliers to take 16m research and development in priority and show them a working 16m system quickly. The ecosystem of 16m could be as large as TDD-LTE or better since all WiMAX TDD operators will naturally migrate to 16m, while the only operator who is behind TDD-LTE is China Mobile. If Indian BWA operators choose WiMAX path than odds are quite high that 16m TDD ecosystem may supersede TDD-LTE.</p>
<p>Samsung, Motorola and Huawei may demonstrate a working 16m trail systems to their operators by end of this year. IEEE standardization is on track and it is expected to release final 16m draft by Q1 2011. Sequans and Beceem plans to release 16e/16m based engineering samples in early 2011. The development effort for migrating core network elements like ASN-GW, AAA and others to 16m is estimated minimal and hence early readiness can be expected.</p>
<p>The whole battle of LTE vs WiMAX is basically turning around two facades. First, It is highly publicized that Performance of LTE –TD based system will be superior to 16e. Second, TD-LTE ecosystem will bring vast economy of scale to operators. I spent some time to figure out the performance of TD-LTE and WiMAX 16e. Since WiMAX 16e doesn&#8217;t support 20 Mhz channels, on a 10 MHz of channel bandwith following observations were noted.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<div>Most of the current WiMAX deployments are on a reuse 3 network. If WiMAX is deployed in reuse 3 network and LTE is deployed in Reuse 1 network, than performance of WiMAX systems is better than LTE Rel 8. Data presented below is measured in different commercial wimax networks and LTE is based in NGMN simulations.</div>
<p><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/052210_0622_Atlast16mun21.jpg" alt="" /></li>
<li>LTE Rel 8 was ratified recently (2009), and in LTE release 8 special attentions were given to introduce methods to circumvent interference and improve overall network efficiency. 16e if deployed in reuse 1 scenario will perform inferior as compared to LTE Rel8. This is one of the major rationales behind most of the 16e deployments in 30MHz of spectrum.</li>
<li>
<div>16m is expected to be deployed in reuse 1 networks and has more advanced interference mitigation techniques and supports even higher spectral efficiency than LTE Rel 8.</div>
<p><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/052210_0622_Atlast16mun31.jpg" alt="" /></li>
</ul>
<p>WiMAX Forum recognized these aspects and in the last general meeting at Taiwan, they have included features like interference mitigation, frequency reuse 1 support, downlink beamforming and 4X2 Mimo  in their technology roadmap for 2010. Roadmap features will be further enhanced to support IMT-A requirement by 2012 with introduction to 4&#215;4 Mimo, self organizing networks, multicarrier and enhanced locations services.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see how the 4G TDD ecosystem shapes but definitely 16m has a important role to play.</p>
<p>Suggested Articles:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/whitepaper-wimax-2-0-for-operators">16m for operators</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/ieee-expects-wimax-2-standardization-by-summer">IEEE expects WiMAX 2 standardization by summer</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/mimo-schemes-in-16m-wimax-2-0">MIMO Schemes in 16m</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/at-last-16m-unearth-supporters-ready-to-mark-its-entry-against-td-lte/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can’t we learn from mango traders?</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/why-can%e2%80%99t-we-learn-from-mango-traders-2</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/why-can%e2%80%99t-we-learn-from-mango-traders-2#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 07:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General 4G Broadband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/why-can%e2%80%99t-we-learn-from-mango-traders-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By BP Tiwari Mangos are my favorite summer fruit. I buy most of my mangoes in Mumbai at a nearby local shop. Back in my hometown we buy most of the mangos from local mango market; otherwise it comes from our mango farms. I am on vacations these days and visiting my parents in my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By BP Tiwari</p>
<p><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/051210_0720_Whycantwele1.jpg" alt="" align="left" />Mangos are my favorite summer fruit. I buy most of my mangoes in Mumbai at a nearby local shop. Back in my hometown we buy most of the mangos from local mango market; otherwise it comes from our mango farms. I am on vacations these days and visiting my parents in my hometown. Yesterday , in a cheerful mood my mother said, why don&#8217;t you sell those excess mangos to market? I was all excited to experience the selling session of mangos in the local mango market. Fortunately our mangos are of good quality and I was eager to make a good impression of skilled mango seller in front of my parents.<span id="more-1017"></span></p>
<p>The way mango is sold in my hometown is quite different than here in Mumbai. Here you can sell them at one tenth of the price you will most likely sell in Mumbai. The rationale could be availability of low wage workers, low transportation and maintenance cost cost and mango farms etc. In fact the average monthly income of the people residing in <strong>Maihar</strong>(the name of my hometown) is 5 to 10 times lower than average monthly income of people in Mumbai. After selling my mangos it came to my mind, <strong>why can&#8217;t we have different charging mechanism in broadband for different cities based on their paying capabilities and social economic factors? </strong><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/it%E2%80%99s-not-wise-to-sell-mercedes-to-everyone">After all you can&#8217;t sell Mercedes to everyone</a>.<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<p>By evening we sold our mangos and I was talking to my old school acquaintance, a mutual friend of ours asked me, is there a way to take lessons in civil engineering without attending college, since my parents cannot afford expenditure of a formal education? He further explained that to me that in his past he has worked in building state roads, small dams, culverts and duplex houses. I actually consoled him by saying, &#8220;N<em>or Bill Gates or Steve Jobs had formal engineering degrees but they generated more jobs than others&#8221;.</em> Nurture your passion with persistence and backed by a burning desire, I am sure nothing in the world will come in your way. However I was eager to show him the free lessons available in the internet by the top professors of the country in the field of civil engineering. The lessons were recorded and brought to the people of country by a new initiative by government of India. (Website: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/nptelhrd">http://www.youtube.com/user/nptelhrd</a> )</p>
<p>The only internet connection available for most of the citizen of country residing in other than <a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/whitepaper-state-and-opportunity-of-broadband-in-india">top 100 cities is through 2G networks</a> like CDMA 1X or GPRS. My CDMA 1X connection was not capable to show him a working streaming video, however he got the suggestion that internet has many promising possibilities for him. If he can get a working internet connection he might learn continuously and improve himself while taking care of his farms.</p>
<p>I do not see a rationale of charging similar broadband prices which is applicable in metro cities to other parts of country. The cost of spectrum, tower rentals, maintenance and manpower is low as compared to metro cities in rural cities and charging mechanism shall apportions these factors.  Everyone is interested in showcasing the grandeur speeds of LTE networks or their new 4G WiMAX RAN. It is true that the first LTE network in Telisonera are capable of supporting over 70 Mbps in 10 MHz channels and over 130 Mbps in 20 MHz channels in Sweden and Norway.</p>
<p>(Note :  1 USD is equal to 7.1 SEK)</p>
<p><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/051210_0720_Whycantwele2.png" alt="" /><img src="cid:image001.gif@01CAC4F7.516B6780" alt="" /></p>
<p>For a 30 GB connection the monthly broadband price of US$ 85 in Sweden is less than 3% of their gross domestic product at purchasing power parity per capita. The cost of a 3 GB wireless data connection in rural India is roughly more than 10% of their gross domestic product at purchasing power parity per capita.</p>
<p>I am sure you will recognize that the debate of tiered charging, data offloading and other business models of 4G data is good for intellectual minds, but we need more common sense from the people who has the power to change<strong><br />
</strong>the scenario of broadband in country. At least I understood that the mango traders of Mumbai and Maihar know for sure that the charging mechanism of metro and rural India cannot be made same. I expect more common sense from government, operators and broadband policy makers to enable some of my school mates to take civil engineering lessons while taking care of their farms and cattle&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Suggested Reading:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/whitepaper-state-and-opportunity-of-broadband-in-india">State and opportunity of broadband in India</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/it%E2%80%99s-not-wise-to-sell-mercedes-to-everyone">It&#8217;s not wise to sell Mercedes to everyone</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/why-can%e2%80%99t-we-learn-from-mango-traders-2/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Innovation driving 4G networks</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/innovation-driving-4g-networks</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/innovation-driving-4g-networks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 07:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/innovation-driving-4g-networks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are fortunate to watch the evolution of new generation base stations which are playing an ever increasing role in delivering affordable broadband to masses. Commonly referred as compact base stations, are the latest base station design which was recently introduced in to the market by all major suppliers like Motorola, Huawei, ALU, Ericson, ZTE, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/050610_0728_Innovationd11.png" alt="" align="left" /><span style="font-size: 10pt;">We are fortunate to watch the evolution of new generation base stations which are playing an ever increasing role in delivering affordable broadband to masses. Commonly referred as compact base stations, are the latest base station design which was recently introduced in to the market by all major suppliers like Motorola, Huawei, ALU, Ericson, ZTE, Samsung etc. They bring 4G operators flexibility and cost savings, while retaining the performance of macro BTSs.</span></p>
<p><span id="more-995"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">These new generation compact BTSs can be installed in single-sector or multiple-sector configurations as alternatives to Macro BTSs with remote radio heads (RRHs).Unlike traditional macro BTSs, compact BTSs do not require ground shelters and cooling equipment, yet they need not compromise on high-performance features such as support for multiple antennas and beamforming.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">The new genre of base stations has the following characteristics which will help operators to remain profitable in data networks. The business of data networks is quite different than voice. Typically operators have to support 100 times more data delivery in almost similar ARPU as compared to Voice. Advancements in MIMO technology and larger chucks of spectrum are playing an important role in shaping evolution of mobile broadband networks; however the emergence of new generation of compact base stations is supporting operators to reduce capex and opex.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/050610_0728_Innovationd31.png" alt="" /><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<ul>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Support for larger channel bandwidths upto 20 MHZ with typical processing capability of over 170 mbps per channel cards in baseband. Multiple 20 MHz carrier aggregation can be supported in this new genre of base stations with multiple channel cards and Remote radio heads.</span></p>
</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Support of the multi-carrier technology (With software configuration, one sector supports multiple carriers to provide larger capacity. In this way, the number of new sites required for capacity expansion decreases, and the capacity expansion cost is cut down.)</span></p>
</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> The advancement in Power amplifiers efficiency has helped operator to reduce their power requirement at least by a factor of half.</span></p>
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/050610_0728_Innovationd41.png" alt="" align="left" /><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">The Remote radio heads can be extended up-to 1 kilometers as their connectivity is based on CPRI/OBSAI interface and has fiber as a interface.</span></p>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<ul>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">New distributed base stations works in natural cooling mode without any cooler and reduces power consumption.</span></p>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<ul>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Migration</span></p>
</div>
<ul>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">WiMAX 16e to WiMAX 16m: This can be easily achieved by replacing the channel cards and upgrading the software to WiMAX 16m. If WiMAX 16e and WiMAX 16m use the same frequency, the RRH need not be replaced. Otherwise, the RRH must be replaced.</span></p>
</div>
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> WiMAX 16e to LTE+/TDD: This configuration can be supported by replacing the channel cards and upgrading the software to LTE. If WiMAX 16e and LTE use the same frequency, the RRH may not be required to change. Otherwise, the RRH must be replaced.</span></p>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">The new 4G base stations are compact ,light, and supports multiple installation modes to reduce the footprint and the labor cost. The RRH are mostly  small and light (&lt;21 kg), and thus it can be installed on a pole, tower, wall, or support. In addition, the RRH can be installed near the antenna system to decrease feeder length and loss so that the feeder cost is reduced.</span></p>
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
</li>
<li>
<div style="text-align: justify;">
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">The Baseband units can be installed in the 19-inch cabinet such as the GSM cabinet or outdoor shelter to avoid extra investment, as shown in below figure.</span></p>
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/050610_0728_Innovationd51.png" alt="" /><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">An Excellent White paper written by Monica Paolini from Senza Fili Consulting highlightsing advantages operators can achieve by using these new compact base stations. With a smaller footprint, lighter weight, and much lower power consumption, they cost less to install and to operate. Operators can save 38% to 47% in capex and opex over a five-year period as per the report.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><a href="http://www.wimax.com/commentary/blog/blog-2010/april-2010/compact-base-stations-a-new-step-in-the-evolution-of-base-station-design-0408"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Download paper here</span></a><span style="font-size: 10pt;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Picture Source: Motorola</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;">Suggesting reading: <a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/wireless-access-strategies-for-operators">Wireless access strategies for operators</a></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/innovation-driving-4g-networks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TD-LTE gaining momentum</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/td-lte-gaining-momentum</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/td-lte-gaining-momentum#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 16:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/td-lte-gaining-momentum</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The industry around TD-LTE is gaining momentum and the appeal of TD-LTE has widened well beyond China. The recent announcement of Qualcomm to bid for TDD spectrum in India to support a TD-LTE deployment confirms the emergence of TD-LTE as global technology, likely to command a substantial market share. First of all, China mobile is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/042910_1611_TDLTEGainin1.png" alt="" align="left" /><span style="color: black;">The industry around TD-LTE is gaining momentum and the appeal of TD-LTE has widened well beyond China. The recent announcement of Qualcomm </span>to bid for TDD spectrum in India to support a TD-LTE deployment confirms the emergence of TD-LTE as global technology, likely to command a substantial market<span style="color: black;"> share.</span></p>
<p><strong>First of all</strong>, China mobile is behind TDD LTE global adoption. The operator has announced that it will establish three experimental TD-LTE (time division-long term evolution) networks separately in three coastal cities &#8211; Qingdao, Xiamen and Zhuhai &#8211; beginning the third quarter of 2010, according to the China-based <em>China Business News  and </em>it will migrate its TD-SCDMA based network to TD-LTE as their next evolution. <span style="color: black;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;"><strong><span id="more-983"></span>Second,</strong></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=189890"></a>Clearwire paved the way for LTE in US<span style="color: black;"> when they submitted a proposal to adopt the 2496MHz-to-2690MHz frequency band in the US for TD-LTE, and it was accepted at a 3GPP meeting earlier this month. The acceptance is significant because it will enable Clearwire and other spectrum holders to deploy TD-LTE, which is the time division duplex (TDD) version of LTE, in the US. </span>Clearwire was not alone in asking for the 2.6GHz spectrum to be defined as a TDD band for LTE. Indeed, there was broad industry support for the proposal from other companies, including: Sprint Nextel Corp. , NII Holdings Inc. , China Mobile Communications Corp. , UK Broadband Ltd. , Motorola Inc. (NYSE: MOT), Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. , TD Tech Ltd. , WiChorus Inc. , ZTE Corp. , Chinese Academy of Telecommunications Technology , Nokia Siemens Networks , Cisco Systems Inc., Sequans Communications , Alcatel-Lucent , Alcatel Shanghai Bell Co. Ltd. , and Rohde &amp; Schwarz GmbH &amp; Co. KG .</p>
<p><span style="color: black;"><strong>Third,</strong></span></p>
<p>Japanese cell-co Softbank Mobile is considering deployment of TD-LTE standard as a 4G network. Senior executive vice president Ted Matsumoto told telecomasia.net that the company could deploy it in the 2.5GHz spectrum it had gained access to ,when it <a href="http://www.telecomasia.net/content/softbank-gains-25ghz-spectrum-willcom" target="_blank">bought a stake in failing PHS operator Willcom</a> last month. But he said <a href="http://www.xgpforum.com/news/page.php?id=43" target="_blank">Willcom&#8217;s next-gen PHS technology, XGP</a>, and mobile Wimax were also under consideration.<span style="color: black;"> </span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;"><strong>Fourth,</strong> As Qualcomm prepares to <a href="http://www.fiercebroadbandwireless.com/story/report-qualcomm-talks-indian-partner-td-lte-jv/2010-04-04"></a></span>bid for broadband wireless access<span style="color: black;"> (BWA) spectrum in India with the intention to deploy TD-LTE, the world&#8217;s largest infrastructure supplier, Ericsson has begun <a href="http://www.fiercebroadbandwireless.com/story/ericsson-lobbies-lte-india/2010-04-05"></a></span>making the case as to why LTE<span style="color: black;"> in the band makes more sense than WiMAX for BWA operators in India.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: black;"><strong>Fifth</strong>, the <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/193677/china_mobile_and_far_eastone_ink_deal_on_tdlte_for_taiwan.html"></a></span>Taiwanese operator Far EasTone said it will jointly develop a next generation TD-LTE mobile network in Taiwan for testing purposes with China Mobile.</p>
<p><strong>Sixth,</strong> suppliers are getting ready to demonstrate their readiness to support TD-LTE based deployments. <a href="http://mediacenter.motorola.com/content/detail.aspx?ReleaseID=12671&amp;NewsAreaId=2">Motorola demonstrated end to end readiness to support LTE TDD with USB dongle devices</a> in Shangai Expo. In a parallel move, <a href="http://ltewatch.blogspot.com/2010/04/nokia-siemens-networks-sets-up.html">Nokia Siemens Networks has inaugurated a TD-LTE Open</a> Lab at its Hangzhou R&amp;D facility and are trailing their base stations with China Mobile. Huawei will deploy TD-LTE demo network along with Motorola in China.  Ericson, Alcatel lucent, ZTE and Samsung are developing LTE-TD based systems for commercial deployments.</p>
<p><strong>Seventh,</strong> Qualcomm, Altair, Sequans, Innofidei, Wavesat has indicated availability of TD-LTE chipsets in 2.3/2.5 GHz. Others like Beceem , Runcom are also developing chipsets and release dates are not committed/known. Possibly QUALCOMM would the first to release LTE-TD samples. QUALCOMM is will put together available TD-LTE engineering samples ( MDM 9600) most likely in 2Q 2010. Commercial availability of chipsets is planned one quarter later. Other chipset supplier will have commercial readiness by Q4 2010. Assuming 2 quarters for ODMs for finished products, it is reasonable to assume availability of LTE-TD devices in Q2 -2011.</p>
<p><span style="color: black;">Finally<strong> </strong></span></p>
<p><strong> </strong>It looks like the time to market advantage for WiMAX is still not over as we see Q1/Q2 2011 as the most optimistic initial deployment timelines of TD-LTE system and initial device would never compete the current prices of WiMAX , however the ecosystem behind LTE can drive significant volume and has the ability to quickly create a competitive ecosystem of device supplier and operators.</p>
<p>Suggested Reading:<span style="color: black;"> </span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/bramnha/lte-and-16m-technology-comparasion-v0-1"><span style="color: black;">1)</span>WiMAX and LTE Performance</a><span style="color: #663300;"> </span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/wimax-or-tdd-lte-in-india"><span style="color: black;">2) </span>WiMAX or TDD LTE in India?</a><span style="color: #663300;"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/td-lte-gaining-momentum/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3G Vs WiMax Performance</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/3g-vs-wimax-performance</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/3g-vs-wimax-performance#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 14:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G Presentations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G WiMAX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got a request to present difference between WiMAX and 3G. Please find couple of slides which will give perspective of 3G vs WiMAX .If you have particular question, do email me at admin@beyond4g.org . Thanks,BP 3 G Vs Wi Max Performance View more presentations from bramnha. I got a request to present difference between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves /> <w:TrackFormatting /> <w:PunctuationKerning /> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas /> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:DoNotPromoteQF /> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables /> <w:SnapToGridInCell /> <w:WrapTextWithPunct /> <w:UseAsianBreakRules /> <w:DontGrowAutofit /> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark /> <w:DontVertAlignCellWithSp /> <w:DontBreakConstrainedForcedTables /> <w:DontVertAlignInTxbx /> <w:Word11KerningPairs /> <w:CachedColBalance /> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math" /> <m:brkBin m:val="before" /> <m:brkBinSub m:val=" " /> <m:smallFrac m:val="off" /> <m:dispDef /> <m:lMargin m:val="0" /> <m:rMargin m:val="0" /> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup" /> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440" /> <m:intLim m:val="subSup" /> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr" /> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"   DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"   LatentStyleCount="267"> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading" /> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--> <!--[if gte mso 10]> <mce:style><!<br />
/* Style Definitions */<br />
table.MsoNormalTable<br />
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";<br />
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;<br />
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;<br />
mso-style-noshow:yes;<br />
mso-style-priority:99;<br />
mso-style-qformat:yes;<br />
mso-style-parent:"";<br />
mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;<br />
mso-para-margin-top:0in;<br />
mso-para-margin-right:0in;<br />
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;<br />
mso-para-margin-left:0in;<br />
line-height:115%;<br />
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;<br />
font-size:11.0pt;<br />
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";<br />
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;<br />
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;<br />
mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";<br />
mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast;<br />
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;<br />
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;}<br />
--> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I got a request to present difference between WiMAX and 3G. Please find couple of slides which will give perspective of 3G vs WiMAX .If you have particular question, do email me at <a href="mailto:admin@beyond4g.org">admin@beyond4g.org</a> .</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks,BP</p>
<div style="width: 425px;"><strong style="display: block; margin: 12px 0 4px;"><a title="3 G Vs Wi Max Performance" href="http://www.slideshare.net/bramnha/3-g-vs-wi-max-performance-3603144">3 G Vs Wi Max Performance</a></strong><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=3gvswimaxperformance-100331085939-phpapp02&amp;stripped_title=3-g-vs-wi-max-performance-3603144" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=3gvswimaxperformance-100331085939-phpapp02&amp;stripped_title=3-g-vs-wi-max-performance-3603144" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></div>
<div id="__ss_3603144" style="width: 425px;">
<div style="padding: 5px 0 12px;">View more <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/">presentations</a> from <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/bramnha">bramnha</a>.</div>
</div>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px; overflow: hidden;">
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:TrackMoves /> <w:TrackFormatting /> <w:PunctuationKerning /> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas /> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:DoNotPromoteQF /> <w:LidThemeOther>EN-US</w:LidThemeOther> <w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian> <w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables /> <w:SnapToGridInCell /> <w:WrapTextWithPunct /> <w:UseAsianBreakRules /> <w:DontGrowAutofit /> <w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark /> <w:DontVertAlignCellWithSp /> <w:DontBreakConstrainedForcedTables /> <w:DontVertAlignInTxbx /> <w:Word11KerningPairs /> <w:CachedColBalance /> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> <m:mathPr> <m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math" /> <m:brkBin m:val="before" /> <m:brkBinSub m:val=" " /> <m:smallFrac m:val="off" /> <m:dispDef /> <m:lMargin m:val="0" /> <m:rMargin m:val="0" /> <m:defJc m:val="centerGroup" /> <m:wrapIndent m:val="1440" /> <m:intLim m:val="subSup" /> <m:naryLim m:val="undOvr" /> </m:mathPr></w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"   DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"   LatentStyleCount="267"> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false"    UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading" /> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--  /* Font Definitions */  @font-face 	{font-family:"Cambria Math"; 	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; 	mso-font-charset:1; 	mso-generic-font-family:roman; 	mso-font-format:other; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	mso-font-signature:0 0 0 0 0 0;} @font-face 	{font-family:Calibri; 	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; 	mso-font-charset:0; 	mso-generic-font-family:swiss; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;}  /* Style Definitions */  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal 	{mso-style-unhide:no; 	mso-style-qformat:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	margin-top:0in; 	margin-right:0in; 	margin-bottom:10.0pt; 	margin-left:0in; 	line-height:115%; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:11.0pt; 	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; 	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink 	{mso-style-priority:99; 	color:blue; 	mso-themecolor:hyperlink; 	text-decoration:underline; 	text-underline:single;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed 	{mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-priority:99; 	color:purple; 	mso-themecolor:followedhyperlink; 	text-decoration:underline; 	text-underline:single;} .MsoChpDefault 	{mso-style-type:export-only; 	mso-default-props:yes; 	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-fareast-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} .MsoPapDefault 	{mso-style-type:export-only; 	margin-bottom:10.0pt; 	line-height:115%;} @page Section1 	{size:8.5in 11.0in; 	margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; 	mso-header-margin:.5in; 	mso-footer-margin:.5in; 	mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 	{page:Section1;} --><!--[if gte mso 10]> <mce:style><!   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-priority:99; 	mso-style-qformat:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin-top:0in; 	mso-para-margin-right:0in; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; 	mso-para-margin-left:0in; 	line-height:115%; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:11.0pt; 	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; 	mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; 	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; 	mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; 	mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;} --> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I got a request to present difference between WiMAX and 3G. Please find couple of slides which will give perspective of 3G vs WiMAX .If you have particular question, do email me at <a href="mailto:admin@beyond4g.org">admin@beyond4g.org</a> .</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/3g-vs-wimax-performance/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LTE Tutorial</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/lte-tutorial</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/lte-tutorial#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 04:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4G Presentations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lte Tutorial View more presentations from ppsong. More LTE Videos at 4GVideo.net]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="__ss_2995262" style="width: 425px; text-align: left;"><a style="font: 14px Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; display: block; margin: 12px 0 3px 0; text-decoration: underline;" title="Lte Tutorial" href="http://www.slideshare.net/ppsong/lte-tutorial">Lte Tutorial</a><object style="margin: 0px;" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="355" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=ltetutorial-100126072043-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=lte-tutorial" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed style="margin: 0px;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="355" src="http://static.slidesharecdn.com/swf/ssplayer2.swf?doc=ltetutorial-100126072043-phpapp01&amp;stripped_title=lte-tutorial" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<div style="font-size: 11px; font-family: tahoma,arial; height: 26px; padding-top: 2px;">View more <a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/">presentations</a> from <a style="text-decoration: underline;" href="http://www.slideshare.net/ppsong">ppsong</a>.</div>
<h1 style="font-size: 11px; font-family: tahoma,arial; height: 26px; padding-top: 2px;">More LTE Videos at <a href="http://www.4gvideo.net/ltetutorials">4GVideo.net</a></h1>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/lte-tutorial/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Report : Path to 4G</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/719</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/719#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source : 3G Americas Wireless data consumption is increasing faster now than ever before,” said Adrian Scrase, 3GPP Head of Mobile Competence Center. “Smartphone usage is experiencing higher volumes and the superior user experience offered by such devices is resulting in quickly rising demand and escalating use of wireless data applications. This is consequently driving [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source : 3G Americas<br />
Wireless data consumption is increasing faster now than ever before,” said Adrian Scrase, 3GPP Head of Mobile Competence Center. “Smartphone usage is experiencing higher volumes and the superior user experience offered by such devices is resulting in quickly rising demand and escalating use of wireless data applications. This is consequently driving the need for continued innovations that are supported by the efficient and successful 3GPP technology path.”</p>
<p>3GPP Mobile Broadband Innovation Path to 4G: Release 9, Release 10 and Beyond: HSPA+, SAE/LTE and LTE-Advanced, is a comprehensive resource intended to assist members of the wireless industry as well as interested members of the general public in understanding details of the work in 3GPP on Release 9 and Release 10. In addition, the report further describes the features of Release 8 that were closed in March 2009.</p>
<p>Release 9, which is targeted for completion by March 2010, will provide increased feature functionality and performance enhancements to both HSPA and LTE. The report reviews additional multi-carrier and MIMO options for HSPA and features and enhancements to support emergency services, location services and broadcast services for LTE. Other Release 9 enhancements include those to support Home NodeB/eNodeB (i.e. femtocells), Self-Organizing/Self-Optimizing Networks (SON) and the evolution of the IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) architecture.<br />
While work for Release 9 is nearing completion, significant progress has already been made in 3GPP on work for Release 10, which includes LTE-Advanced. In fact, 3GPP already submitted a proposal in October 2009 based on LTE-Advanced for the IMT-Advanced evaluation and certification process led by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). The ITU has defined requirements that will officially define and certify technologies as IMT-Advanced, or 4G, and is expected to evaluate submitted proposals by standards organizations for potential certification in the 2010 timeframe; certified 4G/IMT-Advanced technology specifications are projected to be published by early 2011.</p>
<p>As part of Release 10, some of the key LTE-Advanced technology enhancements include carrier aggregation, multi-antenna enhancements and relays. Assuming LTE-Advanced is certified to be IMT-Advanced compliant, 3GPP targets completion of the Release 10 specification by year-end 2010.<br />
“The white paper by 3G Americas provides an excellent overview of the work by 3GPP in determining the standards on the path to 4G,” Scrase said.</p>
<p>The popular white paper, 3GPP Mobile Broadband Innovation <a href="http://www.3gamericas.org/documents/3GPP_Rel-9_Beyond%20Feb%202010.pdf">Path to 4G: Release 9, Release 10 and Beyond: HSPA+, SAE/LTE and LTE-Advanced</a>, was written collaboratively by members of 3G Americas and is available for free downloadon the 3G Americas website at www.3gamericas.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/719/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Network Migration strategies towards LTE</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/network-migration-strategies-towards-lte</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/network-migration-strategies-towards-lte#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aviat Networks CTO Paul Kennard talks on Mobile Network Migration to LTE]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Aviat Networks CTO Paul Kennard talks on Mobile Network Migration to LTE</p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gtySjiBSCUg&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gtySjiBSCUg&#038;hl=en_US&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/network-migration-strategies-towards-lte/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Korean suppliers leading LTE device market</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/korean-suppliers-leading-lte-device-market</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/korean-suppliers-leading-lte-device-market#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 13:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BY, BP TIWARI Last year we heard lot of noise from LTE Infrastructure suppliers especially Nokia, Ericson, Huawei, Alactel and NEC boosting their engagements with world biggest telcos. Earlier I have reported that in Japan DoCoMo and softbank will use 1.5 GHz and KDDI will use 1.5 GHz + 800 MHz and eMobile will use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BY, BP TIWARI<br />
Last year we heard lot of noise from LTE Infrastructure suppliers especially Nokia, Ericson, Huawei, Alactel and NEC boosting their engagements with world biggest telcos.</p>
<p>Earlier I have reported that in Japan DoCoMo and softbank will use 1.5 GHz and KDDI will use 1.5 GHz + 800 MHz and eMobile will use 1.7 GHz for their LTE Deployments. NTT DoCoMo plans commercial LTE launch in December 2010. The initial focus is targeted at PC usage and will be extended to dual-mode 3G/LTE handsets in 2011. By 2014 NTT DoCoMo plans to provide LTE service to 50% of the population from around 20,000 base stations at a cost of between ¥300bn and ¥400bn ($3.2bn to $4.2bn). eMobile has indicated September 2010 LTE launch. </p>
<p>LG electronics is in the race to lead the mobile devices front of LTE .The company also plans to demonstrate a &#8220;handover technology&#8221; that allows operators to link LTE networks with their existing CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access) networks, it said. In bid to gain bigger amount of share in Verizon’s network the supplier has already secured US FCC approval in two models. </p>
<p>In a similar move to gain biggest share in Japanese market ( especially DoCoMo) the Korean supplier has announced that its LD100 data modem has become the first LTE device to receive Telecom Engineering Center (TELEC) certification, clearing the way for the modem to be used in Japan.</p>
<p>During CES, 2010 LG also announced successful live handover between LTE and EV-DO carriers with Alcatel Lucent. LG also achieved major benchmark by completing successful interoperability with Nokia Siemens Networks  to achieve downlink data transfer rate of 100 Mbps, the maximum speed for a Class 3 LTE terminal.</p>
<p>The other Korean giant SAMSUNG who has more than 20% of worldwide market share in mobile phones is also aggressively pushing their LTE strategies. The Korean giant has completed live trials in Teliasonera and secured a contract with TeliaSonera to provide Long Term Evolution (LTE) devices. Devices will be commercially available in Sweden and Norway markets. The Samsung LTE device (Model name: GT-B3710) is expected to be the world’s first LTE device. This device is a USB stick that can be connected to a laptop computer, or other portable devices. The USB stick incorporates Samsung’s in-house developed LTE modem chip, branded Kalmia, and supports 2.6GHz band for LTE service.</p>
<p> To support Japanese(DoCoMo) deployment , In October 2009, NEC, NTT DOCOMO, Panasonic Mobile Communications Co., Ltd. and Fujitsu Limited announced the completion of joint development of an LTE-PF chipset engineering sample. Performance assessment results and development updates on these technologies will be on display at MWC.</p>
<p>We have yet to here from Chinese supplier especially Huawei and ZTE. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/korean-suppliers-leading-lte-device-market/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First drive test reports from LTE network from Teliasonera</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/first-drive-test-reports-from-lte-network-from-teliasonera</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/first-drive-test-reports-from-lte-network-from-teliasonera#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 09:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By BP Tiwari It looks like the 47 mbps in (10MHz FDD channel) peak rate while driving in LTE commercial network is Teliasonera is one of the first report of LTE performance form an operator’s network. We have been hearing about peak data rates of 86 mbps (Lat tests) which was reported by LSTI in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By BP Tiwari<br />
It looks like the 47 mbps in (10MHz FDD channel) peak rate while driving in LTE commercial network is Teliasonera is one of the first report of LTE performance form an operator’s network. We have been hearing about peak data rates of 86 mbps (Lat tests) which was reported by LSTI in February 09 for quite a while. The best part is that commercial networks are actually showing true trends towards claimed performance. We will have to also understand that any wireless technology under full load performs 20-30% of their peak data rate over a sector. </p>
<p>3GPPs evaluation results for different MIMO configurations shows that a release 8 based systems will achieve 17 mbps working in 2&#215;2 MiMO mode in downlink (Average Data Rate) at a full. In the similar amount of spectrum a 4&#215;2 MIMO systems would achieve 19 mbps in downlink. This is two to three times the performance of earlier 3G releases.  </p>
<p>The other significant piece which was reported from Teliasonera commercial network was Latency. Latencies in the range of 20ms were reported which is a huge improvement over earlier releases of 3GPP. The low latency in network will allow operators to provide higher QoS and support demanding applications. This might be the trigger we are waiting for enterprise services over LTE. </p>
<p>Thanks,BP<br />
www.beyond4g.org</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/first-drive-test-reports-from-lte-network-from-teliasonera/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Navigating patent pools and licensing for 4G</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/navigating-patent-pools-and-licensing-for-4g</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/navigating-patent-pools-and-licensing-for-4g#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[source: 4gtrends The 4G wireless ecosystem of today represents an increasingly broader spectrum of innovation and intellectual assets than its 3G predecessor. Innovation drives the 4G wireless industry but it also presents some very unique challenges when it comes to defining the intellectual assets involved and eventually managing the licensing of patents associated with them. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>source: 4gtrends</p>
<p>The 4G wireless ecosystem of today represents an increasingly broader spectrum of innovation and intellectual assets than its 3G predecessor.  Innovation drives the 4G wireless industry but it also presents some very unique challenges when it comes to defining the intellectual assets involved and eventually managing the licensing of patents associated with them.</p>
<p>Jean-Michel Bourdon, President, Via Licensing, explained to 4G Trends that the industry learned much from the experiences of the development of 3G.  “The time and cost incurred in facilitating licensee and licensor transactions was significant.”  Bourdon cited the large number of patents and the international coordination required as being impediments to the development.  In a 4G world intellectual assets can now encompass much more than just those associated with devices and infrastructure.  Assets in the form of operating systems and applications &#8211; on device or in the network core &#8211; are even more prevalent.<span id="more-681"></span></p>
<p>4G wireless technology arguably starts out with at least 3 underlying standards &#8211; WiMAX, LTE and 802.11n WiFi.  You might also consider that there are other wireless technologies that can be adjuncts &#8211; like NFC, RFID, etc.  Critical in the evolution of 4G solutions is expedient and cost-effective access to intellectual assets of others that can be combined to create something even more compelling for the ecosystem.  Ultimate creativity for innovation and solution development comes from ready access to these assets.  Without it, development is slowed and opportunities missed or avoided.</p>
<p>Recognizing the challenges and obstacles associated with the complexities of managing these assets the IEEE and Open Patent Alliance have formed a unique industry collaboration with Via Licensing.  For IEEE the relationship with Via Licensing represents an opportunity to shorten the time between the setting of industry standards and the licensing of same.  Formed in 2008, the OPA’s objective is to foster a global ecosystem focused on delivering broader choice, competitive equipment and service costs for WiMAX technology, devices and applications.   There are currently 11 members of the OPA who will, through the relationship with Via Licensing, take advantage of an administered pool of WiMAX technology patents.  What the collaboration means for participants is relatively simple but extremely valuable.  The collaboration provide a single relationship, a simplified license transaction and single royalty reporting destination.</p>
<p>But this is just a start, a good one but certainly one that will need to continue to grow.  Extending an open patent collaboration further into the 4G wireless ecosystem just makes sense.  Aside from the benefits of reduced time and cost, this type of collaboration has the potential to drive a further commitment to and adoption of standards.  It also removes a level of “noise” and perhaps reluctance or hesitation, allowing the ecosystem to focus on the objective of making 4G wireless and the mobile Internet truly pervasive and Anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/navigating-patent-pools-and-licensing-for-4g/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Technologies and Standards for TD-SCDMA Evolutions to IMT-Advanced</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/technologies-and-standards-for-td-scdma-evolutions-to-imt-advanced</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/technologies-and-standards-for-td-scdma-evolutions-to-imt-advanced#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: 3g4g blog download presentation: http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/21/05/T21050000010003PDFE.pdf This is a summary of a paper from IEEE Communications Magazine, Dec 2009 issue titled &#8220;Technologies and Standards for TD-SCDMA Evolutions to IMT-Advanced&#8221; by Mugen Peng and Wenbo Wang of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications with my own comments and understanding. As I have blogged about in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source: 3g4g blog</p>
<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">download presentation: </span><a href="http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/21/05/T21050000010003PDFE.pdf"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/21/05/T21050000010003PDFE.pdf</span></a></p>
<div></div>
<div>This is a summary of a paper from <a href="http://dl.comsoc.org/livepubs/ci1/public/2009/dec/peng.html">IEEE Communications Magazine</a>, Dec 2009 issue titled &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; white-space: pre;">Technologies and Standards for TD-SCDMA Evolutions to IMT-Advanced<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia,serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;">&#8221; by Mugen Peng and Wenbo Wang of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications with my own comments and understanding.</span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div>As I have blogged about in the past that <a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2009/10/all-eyes-on-china-mobile-td-scdma.html">China Mobile has launched </a>TD-SCDMA network in China and the main focus to to iron out the basic problems before moving onto the evolved TD-SCDMA network. Couple of device manufacturers have already started working on the TD-HSPA devices. Couple of months back, 3G Americas<a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2009/11/focus-on-td-lte-by-3g-americas.html"> published a whitepaper</a> giving overview and emphasising the advantages of TDD flavour of LTE as compared to FDD. The next milestone is the <a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2010/01/3gpp-imt-advanced-workshop-in-beijing.html">IMT-Advanced</a> that is <a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2010/01/3gpp-imt-advanced-workshop-in-beijing.html">under discussion</a> at the moment and China has already proposed TD-LTE-Advanced which would be compatible with the TD-SCDMA technology.</div>
<p><a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2010/01/technologies-and-standards-for-td-scdma.html">Read full article from 3g4g blog</a></p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;">
<h3 class="post-title entry-title"><a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2010/01/technologies-and-standards-for-td-scdma.html">Technologies and Standards for TD-SCDMA Evolutions to IMT-Advanced</a></h3>
<p><a href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_mAJDMuyu_WI/S0o75ppeAsI/AAAAAAAACI4/pwZKr_ijK8I/s1600-h/TD_SCDMA_StandardsEvolution.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5425214562739552962" style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 400px; height: 213px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_mAJDMuyu_WI/S0o75ppeAsI/AAAAAAAACI4/pwZKr_ijK8I/s400/TD_SCDMA_StandardsEvolution.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">Picture Source: </span><a href="http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/21/05/T21050000010003PDFE.pdf"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-small;">http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/21/05/T21050000010003PDFE.pdf</span></a></p>
<div></div>
<div>This is a summary of a paper from <a href="http://dl.comsoc.org/livepubs/ci1/public/2009/dec/peng.html">IEEE Communications Magazine</a>, Dec 2009 issue titled &#8220;<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; white-space: pre;">Technologies and Standards for TD-SCDMA Evolutions to IMT-Advanced<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Georgia,serif; font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;">&#8221; by Mugen Peng and Wenbo Wang of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications with my own comments and understanding.</span></span></div>
<div></div>
<div>As I have blogged about in the past that <a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2009/10/all-eyes-on-china-mobile-td-scdma.html">China Mobile has launched </a>TD-SCDMA network in China and the main focus to to iron out the basic problems before moving onto the evolved TD-SCDMA network. Couple of device manufacturers have already started working on the TD-HSPA devices. Couple of months back, 3G Americas<a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2009/11/focus-on-td-lte-by-3g-americas.html"> published a whitepaper</a> giving overview and emphasising the advantages of TDD flavour of LTE as compared to FDD. The next milestone is the <a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2010/01/3gpp-imt-advanced-workshop-in-beijing.html">IMT-Advanced</a> that is <a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2010/01/3gpp-imt-advanced-workshop-in-beijing.html">under discussion</a> at the moment and China has already proposed TD-LTE-Advanced which would be compatible with the TD-SCDMA technology.</div>
<div></div>
<div>For anyone who does not know the difference between TDD, FDD and TD-SCDMA please see <a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2009/09/td-scdma-tdd-and-fdd.html">this blog</a>.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The TD-SCDMA technology has been standardised quite a while back but the <a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2009/10/td-scdma-politics.html">rollout has been slow</a>. The commercial TD-SCDMA network was rolled out in 2009 and more and more device manufacturers are getting interested in the technology. This could be due to the fact that China Mobile has a customer base of over 500 million subscribers. As of July 2009 over 100 device manufacturers were working on TD-SCDMA technology.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The big problem with TD-SCDMA (as in the case of R99 3G) is that the practical data rate is 350kbps max. This can definitely not provide a broadband experience. To increase the data rates there are two different approaches. First is the Short Term Evolution (STE) and the other is Long Term Evolution (LTE).</div>
<div></div>
<div>The first phase of evolution as can be seen in the picture above is the TD-STE. This consists of single carrier and multi-carrier TD-HSDPA/TD-HSUPA (TD-HSPA), TD-MBMS and TD-HSPA+.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The LTE part is known as <a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2009/06/drivers-for-td-lte.html">TD-LTE</a>. There is a definite evolution path specified from TD-SCDMA to TD-LTE and hence TD-LTE is widely supported by the TD-SCDMA technology device manufacturers and operators. The target of TD-LTE is to enhance the capabilities of coverage, service provision, and mobility support of TD-SCDMA. To save investment and make full use of the network infrastructure available, the design of TD-LTE takes into account the features of TD-SCDMA, and keeps TD-LTE backward compatible with TD-SCDMA and TD-STE systems to ensure smooth migration.</div>
<div></div>
<div>The final phase of evolution is the 4G technology or IMT-Advanced and the TD-SCDMA candidate for TD-LTE+ is <a href="http://3g4g.blogspot.com/2009/10/china-proposes-td-lte-advanced-as-its.html">TD-LTE-Advanced</a>. Some mature techniques related to the TD-SCDMA characteristics, such as beamforming (BF), dynamic channel allocation, and uplink synchronization, will be creatively incorporated in the TD-LTE+ system.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Some academic proposals were also made like the one <a href="http://www.tdscdma-forum.org/EN/pdfword/20059817513571399.pdf">available here</a> on the future evolution of TD-SCDMA but they lacked the industry requirements and are just useful for theoretical research.</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>The standards of TD-SCDMA and its evolution systems are supervised by 3GPP in Europe and by CCSA (Chinese Cellular Standards Association) in China. In March 2001 3GPP fulfilled TD-SCDMA low chip rate (LCR) standardization in Release 4 (R4). The improved R4 and Release 5 (R5) specifications have added some promising functions including HSDPA, synchronization procedures, terminal location (angle of arrival [AOA]-aided location), and so on.</div>
<div></div>
<div>When the industry standardizations supervised by CCSA are focusing on the integration of R4 and R5, the N-frequency TD-SCDMA and the extension of HSDPA from single- to multicarrier are presented. Meanwhile, some networking techniques, such as N-frequency, polarized smart antenna, and a new networking configuration with baseband unit plus remote radio unit (BBU+RRU), are present in the commercial application of TD-SCDMA.</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>TD-SCDMA STE</strong></div>
<div><strong><br />
</strong></div>
<div>
<div>For the first evolution phase of TD-SCDMA, three alternative solutions are considered. The first one is compatible with WCDMA STE, which is based on HSDPA/HSUPA technology. The second is to provide MBMS service via the compatible multicast broadcast single-frequency network (MBSFN) technique or the new union time-slot network (UTN) technique. The last is HSPA+ to achieve similar performance as LTE.</div>
<div></div>
<div>On a single carrier, TD-HSDPA can reach a peak rate of 2.8 Mb/s for each carrier when the</div>
<div>ratio of upstream and downstream time slots is 1:5. The theoretical peak transmission rate of a three-carrier HSDPA system with 16-quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) is up to 8.4 Mb/s.</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>Single-carrier TD-HSUPA can achieve different throughput rates if the configurations and parameters are varied, including the number of occupied time slots, the modulation, and the transport block size in bytes. Considering the complexity of a terminal with several carriers in TD-HSUPA, multicarrier is configured in the Node B, while only one carrier is employed in the terminal.</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>In Rel-7 based TD-HSPA+, In order to match the performance of orthogonal frequency-division multiple access (OFDMA)-based TD-LTE systems, some advanced techniques are utilized, such as multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO), polarized BF, higher modulation and coding schemes (64-QAM is available), adaptive fast scheduling, multicarrier techniques, and so on. Theoretically, 64-QAM can improve performance by a factor of 1.5 compared to the current 16-QAM; for single-carrier the peak rate reaches 4.2 Mb/s, and three-carrier up to 12.6 Mb/s.</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>For the MIMO technique, double transmit antenna array (D-TxAA), based on the pre-coding method at the transmitter, has been employed in frequency-division duplex (FDD)-HSPA+ systems, while selective per antenna rate control (S-PARC), motivated by the Shannon capacity limit for an open loop MIMO link, has been applied in TD-HSPA+ systems.</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>TD-SCDMA LTE</strong></div>
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>The TD-SCDMA LTE program was kicked off in November 2004, and the LTE demand report was approved in June 2005. The LTE specified for TD_SCDMA evolution is named TD-LTE.</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>LTE systems are supposed to work in both FDD and TDD modes. LTE TDD and FDD modes have been greatly harmonized in the sense that both modes share the same underlying framework, including radio access schemes OFDMA in downlink and SC-FDMA in uplink, basic subframe formats, configuration protocols, and so on.</div>
<div></div>
<div>TD-LTE <a href="http://www.huawei.com/news/view.do?id=11106&amp;cid=42">trials have already started</a> last year with some <a href="http://www.cellular-news.com/story/40695.php">positive results</a>.</div>
<div></div>
<div><strong>TD-SCDMA LTE+</strong></div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>IMT-Advanced can be regarded as a B3G/4G standard, and the current TD-SCDMA standard migrating to IMT-Advanced can be regarded as a thorough revolution. TD-LTE advanced (TD-LTE+) is a good match with the TD-SCDMA revolution to IMT-Advanced.</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>It is predicted that the future TD-SCDMA revolution technology will support data rates up to approximately 100 Mb/s for high mobility and up to approximately 1 Gb/s for low mobility such as nomadic/local wireless access.</div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>Recently, some advanced techniques have been presented for TD-LTE+ in China, ranging from the system architecture to the radio processing techniques, such as multi-user (MU)-BF, wireless relaying, and carrier aggregation (CA).</div>
<div></div>
<div>For MU-BF see the paper proposed by Huawei, CHina Mobile and CATT <a href="http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_55b/Docs/R1-090133.zip">here</a> (http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_55b/Docs/R1-090133.zip).</div>
<div></div>
<div>For Wireless Relaying see the ZTE paper <a href="http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_56b/Docs/R1-091423.zip">here</a> (http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_56b/Docs/R1-091423.zip).</div>
<div></div>
<div>To achieve higher performance and target peak data rates, LTE+ systems should support bandwidth greater than 20 MHz (e.g., up to 100 MHz). Consequently, the requirements for TD-LTE+ include support for larger transmission bandwidths than in TD-LTE. Moreover, there should be backward compatibility so that a TD-LTE user can work in TD-LTE+ networks. CA is a concept that can provide bandwidth scalability while maintaining backward compatibility with TD-LTE through any of the constituent carriers, where multiple component carriers are aggregated to the desired TD-LTE+ system bandwidth. A TD-LTE R8 terminal can receive one of these component carriers, while an TD-LTE+ terminal can simultaneously access multiple component carriers. Compared to other approaches, CA does not require extensive changes to the TD-LTE physical layer structure and simplifies reuse of existing implementations. For more on Carrier Aggregation see CATT, LGE and Motorola paper <a href="http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_56b/Docs/R1-091655.zip">here</a> (http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/tsg_ran/WG1_RL1/TSGR1_56b/Docs/R1-091655.zip).</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div></div>
<p>Finally, there are some interesting developments happening in the TD-SCDMA market with bigger players getting interested. Once a critical mass is reached in the number of subscribers as well as the manufacturers I wouldnt be surprised if this technology is exported beyond the Chinese borders. With clear and defined evolution path this could be a win-win situation for everyone</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/technologies-and-standards-for-td-scdma-evolutions-to-imt-advanced/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Usage based charging models for LTE says Verizon</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/usage-based-charging-models-for-lte-says-verizon</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/usage-based-charging-models-for-lte-says-verizon#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source : Fiercewireless Verizon Wireless likely will introduce a usage-based pricing model when it launches its LTE network in commercial markets later this year, a Verizon executive said, lending credence to the idea that wireless carriers will increasingly adopt the model in the future. The pricing paradigm likely will shift because there will be so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source : Fiercewireless</p>
<p>Verizon Wireless likely will introduce a usage-based pricing model when it launches its LTE network in commercial markets later this year, a Verizon executive said, lending credence to the idea that wireless carriers will increasingly adopt the model in the future.</p>
<p>The pricing paradigm likely will shift because there will be so many devices that run on the LTE network that customers will not buy in Verizon&#8217;s stores, Verizon Communications CTO Dick Lynch said. Instead, the company will probably introduce a pricing scheme in which customers will be charged a base rate for using the network on LTE-connected devices&#8211;including tablets and appliances&#8211;but will then charge customers based on how much bandwidth they use.<span id="more-631"></span></p>
<p>&#8220;The problem we have today with flat-based usage is that you are trying to encourage customers to be efficient in use and applications, but you are getting some people who are bandwidth hogs using gigabytes a month and they are paying something like megabytes a month,&#8221; Lynch said in an interview with the <em>Washington Post</em>. &#8220;That isn&#8217;t long-term sustainable. Why should customers using an average amount of bandwidth be subsidizing bandwidth hogs?&#8221;</p>
<p>The company plans on launching 25-30 commercial LTE markets this year, covering a total of 100 million POPs. It has not detailed any pricing plans for the network, but has said that network will provide average data speeds of 5-12 Mbps for downloads and 2-5 Mbps for uploads.</p>
<p>Lynch&#8217;s comments are not entirely surprising. He made similar remarks at a broadband trade show in September, where he argued that metered broadband was going to eventually become a reality.</p>
<p>AT&amp;T Mobility has said it will introduce incentives to get its customers to use wireless broadband more efficiently, though it has not said it will introduce usage-based pricing. Analysts have been speculating that more and more wireless operators will eventually go that route as data traffic keeps growing.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you look at what&#8217;s happening today, they&#8217;re being forced by necessity to adopt usage-based models,&#8221; Phil Asmundson, Deloitte&#8217;s vice chairman and leader of its U.S. technology, media and telecommunications group, told <em>Telephony</em>. &#8220;All-you-can-eat business models depend on your ability to predict how much data your customers will consume. The iPhone has proven that you can&#8217;t make those kind of predictions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-envisions-usage-based-model-lte/2010-01-08#ixzz0cDXmyDUQ">http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/verizon-envisions-usage-based-model-lte/2010-01-08#ixzz0cDXmyDUQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/usage-based-charging-models-for-lte-says-verizon/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Motorola demos LTE-equipped Android tablet</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/motorola-demos-lte-equipped-android-tablet</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/motorola-demos-lte-equipped-android-tablet#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=628</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Motorola demonstrated a tablet device running on a Verizon Wireless LTE test network that could debut in the fourth quarter, though its actual market release likely will depend on Verizon&#8217;s LTE deployment schedule. The demonstration, made at the Consumer Electronics Show, was one of several high-profile devices that have been shown off at the gadget [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Motorola demonstrated a tablet device running on a Verizon Wireless LTE test network that could debut in the fourth quarter, though its actual market release likely will depend on Verizon&#8217;s LTE deployment schedule. The demonstration, made at the Consumer Electronics Show, was one of several high-profile devices that have been shown off at the gadget trade show this week in Las Vegas.</p>
<p><img src="http://assets.fiercemarkets.com/files/wireless/fierceimages/moto_tablet_android_copy.jpg" border="0" alt="Motorola Android tablet" hspace="5" vspace="1" width="200" height="241" align="left" />The Motorola prototype runs Google&#8217;s Android platform, has a 7-inch screen, room for 32 GB of internal memory, an Nvidia chipset, and, most importantly, a modem from Motorola. &#8221;I can anticipate it being a $300 device but we have to go through the pricing process,&#8221; Don Schoch, Motorola&#8217;s director of program management, told <em>Reuters</em>. Verizon plans to deploy 25-30 commercial LTE markets&#8211;covering 100 million POPs, this year, but its specific buildout schedule has not yet been made public.<span id="more-628"></span></p>
<p>The Motorola tablet was not the only LTE device on hand at the show. Indeed, Samsung too was demonstrating prototype LTE devices at the event, including a media player, digital picture frame and camera. The company highlighted the possibilities of LTE by showing how an LTE-equipped video camera could stream live video over a demo LTE network to the company&#8217;s LTE-capable media player. A Samsung executive said all the devices could be released commercially for Verizon&#8217;s LTE network when it launches, but when pressed declined to confirm whether Samsung would in fact sell the devices.</p>
<p>Interestingly, Motorola&#8217;s tablet was just one of many such slab devices, evidence of a growing trend among manufacturers to push that particular form factor. Dell demonstrated a small slate computer with a 5-inch screen running Android, but declined to provide any pricing details or confirmation that it would be commercially released. Additionally, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer displayed a small touchscreen tablet made HP earlier this week. All of this comes ahead of a widely expected&#8211;but still unannounced&#8211;Apple tablet, which may sport wide area wireless connectivity.</p>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://www.fiercewireless.com/ceslive/story/motorola-demos-lte-tablet-market-heats/2010-01-08#ixzz0cDWet7V7">http://www.fiercewireless.com/ceslive/story/motorola-demos-lte-tablet-market-heats/2010-01-08#ixzz0cDWet7V7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/motorola-demos-lte-equipped-android-tablet/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GCF to Deliver LTE Device Certification by Year-End</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/gcf-to-deliver-lte-device-certification-by-year-end</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/gcf-to-deliver-lte-device-certification-by-year-end#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source :Cellular news GCF, the Global Certification Forum, says that it is on schedule to release an LTE device certification scheme before the end of 2010 &#8211; in time for a wave of commercial LTE network launches expected towards the end of the year. GCF&#8217;s unified scheme will embrace both FDD and TDD versions of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source :Cellular news</p>
<p>GCF, the Global Certification Forum, says that it is on schedule to release an LTE device certification scheme before the end of 2010 &#8211; in time for a wave of commercial LTE network launches expected towards the end of the year. GCF&#8217;s unified scheme will embrace both FDD and TDD versions of LTE.</p>
<p>Bringing sophisticated new technologies such as LTE within the scope of GCF Certification is a massive undertaking involving the selection, prioritisation and validation of more than 280 conformance tests in the first instance. In addition a comprehensive field trial regime is being developed. The test industry plays a vital role through the timely investment in the required new test platforms and test facilities.</p>
<p><span id="more-622"></span>To meet the needs of the US, Japanese and European markets, LTE Certification will initially encompass the FDD frequency bands at 700 MHz, 2100 MHz and 2500 MHz respectively. For TDD, certification is currently being developed for the 2300-2400 MHz and 2570-2620 MHz bands that have been allocated for LTE in China. GCF is structuring LTE certification so that, as the need arises, it can be extended quickly and efficiently to other frequency bands.</p>
<p>The development of conformance testing has been divided into three distinct areas: RF; the E-UTRA protocol; and the Evolved Packet Core protocol. A total of six teams have been established to develop the conformance criteria for each of the three areas across the FDD and TDD variants.</p>
<p>The prioritisation and definition of conformance testing are now virtually complete for both FDD and TDD and the validation of agreed conformance tests is beginning to gather momentum†. GCF is working very closely with RAN5, the 3GPP group responsible for developing mobile device conformance test standards, to ensure that the scheme remains aligned with the very latest developments in 3GPP.</p>
<p>The development of LTE certification enjoys the active support of GCF members from around the world. Operators from Japan and China are providing overall leadership for the conformance testing efforts for FDD and TDD respectively while six leading manufacturers have stepped forward to lead the work items that make up each of the FDD and TDD strands of the project.</p>
<p>Requirements for field trials &#8211; a unique feature of GCF Certification &#8211; are being prioritised into two phases by GCF&#8217;s Field Trial Agreement Group (FTAG). With a target completion date of June 2010, phase 1 requirements will include between 80 and 90 new field test scenarios consistent with the functionality anticipated in the first commercial LTE devices. Around 40% of the test cases have already been written.</p>
<p>Several major operators, manufacturers, test companies and the GSMA Devices Group are working together on the development of LTE field trial procedures.</p>
<p>&#8220;Certification will play a critical role in the long-term commercial success of LTE,&#8221; said Adriana Nugter, GCF Operations Manager. &#8220;GCF has been formally working on LTE Certification since March 2008 and by focusing the efforts of experts from across the operator, manufacturer and test communities, we are confident that certification will be in place in time for a wave of operator launches anticipated towards the end of the year.&#8221;</p>
<p>Posted to the site on 10th January 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/gcf-to-deliver-lte-device-certification-by-year-end/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile and Huawei Complete Testing on World&#8217; s First LTE Self-Organizing Network</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/t-mobile-and-huawei-complete-testing-on-world-s-first-lte-self-organizing-network</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/t-mobile-and-huawei-complete-testing-on-world-s-first-lte-self-organizing-network#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The advanced SON solution enables operational expenses reduction over the lifetime of LTE networks October 27, Innsbruck Austria] Huawei, a leader in providing next-generation telecommunications network solutions for operators around the world, today announced that it has successfully completed the world&#8217; s first test for LTE self-organizing network (SON) with T-Mobile in Innsbruck, Austria. Through [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The advanced SON solution enables operational expenses reduction over the lifetime of LTE networks</p>
<p>October 27, Innsbruck Austria] Huawei, a leader in providing next-generation telecommunications network solutions for operators around the world, today announced that it has successfully completed the world&#8217; s first test for LTE self-organizing network (SON) with T-Mobile in Innsbruck, Austria. Through the solution&#8217; s ability to configure, optimize and recover automatically, the LTE SON will offer operators operational cost savings associated with network planning, network deployment and network optimization.</p>
<p>Using T-Mobile&#8217; s existing eNodeBs, the test aims at verifying the functionality of Automatic Neighbour Relation (ANR) in Huawei&#8217; s SON solution. The test result shows high successful handover rate and demonstrates that the SON solution is able to automatically establish and optimize the neighbour relations, and satisfies the requirement of future LTE commercial networks. As network topology changes, the LTE SON solution will ensure a high level of network connectivity and optimization of network-wide performance</p>
<p><a href="http://www.huawei.com/news/view.do?id=11039&amp;cid=42" target="_blank">Read full article&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/t-mobile-and-huawei-complete-testing-on-world-s-first-lte-self-organizing-network/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Omnitele foresees 15-25 Mbps user data rates from LTE Source</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/omnitele-foresees-15-25-mbps-user-data-rates-from-lte-source</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/omnitele-foresees-15-25-mbps-user-data-rates-from-lte-source#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: Omnitele press release Most of the first commercial LTE deployments are said to utilise 20MHz bandwidth and 2&#215;2 MIMO antenna schemes. When breaking down the performance of LTE features in different channel conditions and simulating them in a realistic metropolitan network environment, Omnitele estimates the achievable average LTE user data rates to be in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.omnitele.fi/press_releases/00000044_Omnitele%20foresees%2015-25%20Mbps%20user%20data%20rates%20from%20LTE.pdf">Source: Omnitele press release</a><br />
Most of the first commercial LTE deployments are said to utilise 20MHz bandwidth and 2&#215;2 MIMO antenna schemes. When breaking down the performance of LTE features in different channel conditions and simulating them in a realistic metropolitan network environment, Omnitele estimates the achievable average LTE user data rates to be in the range of 15- 25 Mbps per 20MHz frequency bandwidth.</p>
<p>Omnitele sees LTE to have great potential as it outperforms the current baseline HSDPA in terms of data rates by a factor of ten and HSPA+ technologies by a factor of 3-4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/omnitele-foresees-15-25-mbps-user-data-rates-from-lte-source/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LTE roadmap by Ericsson</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/lte-roadmap-by-ericsson</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/lte-roadmap-by-ericsson#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Broadband]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Key Findings; 1. Mobile broadband in the next big global phenomena 2. IP and LTE technologies enables convergence 3. Ericsson is committed to drive ecosystem globally towards 50B Connections in 2020 Download presentation here&#8230; Thanks,BP]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Key Findings;</p>
<p>1. Mobile broadband in the next big global phenomena</p>
<p>2. IP and LTE technologies enables convergence</p>
<p>3. Ericsson is committed to drive ecosystem globally towards 50B Connections in 2020</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ewh.ieee.org/r6/scv/comsoc/Talk_111109_MobileBroadband.pdf">Download presentation here&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Thanks,BP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/lte-roadmap-by-ericsson/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DoCoMo starts LTE rollout</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/docomo-starts-lte-rollout</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/docomo-starts-lte-rollout#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 03:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: Tele geography Japan’s largest mobile operator by subscribers NTT DoCoMo today announced that it has begun to deploy new W-CDMA base stations equipped with newly developed Remote Radio Equipment (RRE) units, in preparation for the launch of ultra-high speed Long Term Evolution (LTE) services. The cellco plans to launch the next generation 4G mobile [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.telegeography.com/cu/article.php?article_id=31402&amp;email=html">Source: Tele geography </a></p>
<div id="body-content-1-column">
<p>Japan’s largest mobile operator by subscribers NTT DoCoMo today announced  that it has begun to deploy new W-CDMA base stations equipped with newly  developed Remote Radio Equipment (RRE) units, in preparation for the launch of  ultra-high speed Long Term Evolution (LTE) services. The cellco plans to launch  the next generation 4G mobile network in December 2010 using the 2GHz band.  Unlike conventional BTSs that are equipped with an antenna and switching  equipment in a single location, RREs enable a single larger base station to  cover a wider area by utilising extensions via fibre-optic cabling from major  base stations situated in other locations. As such, RRE-equipped BTSs comprise a  master unit (slave station) for signal processing and maintenance functions and  the RRE for modulating and demodulating both W-CDMA and LTE signals transmitted  and received via antenna. The two are linked by optical fibre.</p>
<p>The  RRE-equipped base stations will account for about half of the initial LTE base  stations when DoCoMo launches its LTE service next year.</p></div>
<p><!-- InstanceEndEditable --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/docomo-starts-lte-rollout/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Huawei wins Swedish LTE deal</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/huawei-wins-swedish-lte-deal</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/huawei-wins-swedish-lte-deal#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: Telecoms Chinese equipment vendor Huawei was making lots of noise on Friday, after it was awarded the contract to build an LTE network in Sweden, beating local rival Ericsson. Huawei will deploy kit for Net4Mobility, the joint venture owned by Tele2 and Telenor, through 2010. The goal is that 99 per cent of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.telecoms.com/17181/huawei-wins-swedish-lte-deal">Source: Telecoms</a></p>
<p>Chinese equipment vendor Huawei was making lots of noise on  Friday, after it was awarded the contract to build an LTE network in Sweden,  beating local rival Ericsson.</p>
<p>Huawei will deploy kit for Net4Mobility, the joint venture owned by Tele2 and  Telenor, through 2010.</p>
<p>The goal is that 99 per cent of the Swedish population will be able to access  the new network before the end of 2013, starting with densely populated areas.  The deployment also includes a provision to increase the number of 2G base  stations for voice traffic in by 30-50 per cent, with enhanced indoor- and  outdoor coverage across the country as a result.</p>
<p>In related news, <a href="http://www.telecoms.com/17164/stick-and-stones">Huawei’s been boasting </a>that its test network in Oslo, for TeliaSonera, reached speeds of 96Mbps,  compared to an Ericsson run network in Stockholm that recorded speeds of only  43-44Mbps. But the company even says that in Oslo, it had twice the spectrum  (20MHz) available to it, when compared to Ericsson in Sweden (10MHz), explaining  away the discrepancy and taking the bit out of its boast.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ciol.com/Global-News/News-Reports/Tele2-Telenor-pick-Huawei-for-4G-supply/181209129152/0/">Additional information about the deal from CIOL</a></p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/huawei-wins-swedish-lte-deal/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOCOMO to use Remote Radio Equipment for LTE Base Stations</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/docomo-to-use-remote-radio-equipment-for-lte-base-stations</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/docomo-to-use-remote-radio-equipment-for-lte-base-stations#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source : NTT DOCOMO TOKYO, JAPAN, December 17, 2009 &#8212; NTT DOCOMO, INC. announced today that in preparation for the start of extra-high-speed LTE mobile service, it is deploying new W-CDMA base stations equipped with newly developed remote radio equipment (RRE) units to provide both existing W-CDMA and forthcoming LTE service. The RRE-equipped base stations will account for about half of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; padding: 0px;"><a href="http://www.nttdocomo.com/pr/2009/001465.html">Source : NTT DOCOMO</a><a href="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/20091217_01.gif"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-345" title="20091217_01" src="http://www.beyond4g.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/20091217_01-300x235.gif" alt="20091217_01" width="300" height="235" /></a></p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; padding: 0px;">TOKYO, JAPAN, December 17, 2009 &#8212; NTT DOCOMO, INC. announced today that in preparation for the start of extra-high-speed LTE mobile service, it is deploying new W-CDMA base stations equipped with newly developed remote radio equipment (RRE) units to provide both existing W-CDMA and forthcoming LTE service.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; padding: 0px;">The RRE-equipped base stations will account for about half of the initial LTE base stations when DOCOMO becomes one of world&#8217;s first operators to launch an LTE service in December 2010.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; padding: 0px;">The deployment is a part of DOCOMO&#8217;s initial plan to layer a 2GHz LTE network over its existing 3G network to provide dual W-CDMA/LTE service, which will combine the benefits of LTE&#8217;s high transmission speeds with 3G&#8217;s wide-area coverage as the LTE network is expanded gradually.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; padding: 0px;">The new RRE (also known as remote radio head) allows the relatively easy and efficient installation of LTE base stations to existing W-CDMA base stations (see diagrams below). Compared to existing equipment, it also helps to lower operational costs thanks to its reduced weight, size and energy consumption.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; padding: 0px;">The RRE-equipped base station comprises a master unit for signal processing and maintenance functions and the RRE for modulating and demodulating both W-CDMA and LTE signals transmitted and received via antenna. The two are linked by optical fiber.</p>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 15px; margin-left: 0px; font-size: 13px; line-height: 18px; padding: 0px;">Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/docomo-to-use-remote-radio-equipment-for-lte-base-stations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ZTE Demos 130Mbps Download Speeds on TD-LTE Network</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/zte-demos-130mbps-download-speeds-on-td-lte-network</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/zte-demos-130mbps-download-speeds-on-td-lte-network#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: Cellular News China&#8217;s ZTE says that it has successfully demonstrated its TD-LTE network technology and achieved a downlink speed of 130Mbps, the highest level in the industry. ZTE is the first company to reach the theoretical limit of TD-LTE throughput in downlink. Read full Article..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Source: Cellular News</p>
<p>China&#8217;s ZTE says that it has successfully demonstrated its TD-LTE network technology and achieved a downlink speed of 130Mbps, the highest level in the industry. ZTE is the first company to reach the theoretical limit of TD-LTE throughput in downlink.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cellular-news.com/story/41022.php">Read full Article..</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/zte-demos-130mbps-download-speeds-on-td-lte-network/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nokia Siemens Networks rings up another first in LTE with 3GPP standardized voice calls Source</title>
		<link>http://www.beyond4g.org/nokia-siemens-networks-rings-up-another-first-in-lte-with-3gpp-standardized-voice-calls-source</link>
		<comments>http://www.beyond4g.org/nokia-siemens-networks-rings-up-another-first-in-lte-with-3gpp-standardized-voice-calls-source#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BP Tiwari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[4G LTE]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyond4g.org/?p=312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Source: Nokia Siemens Networks press release Successful IMS-compliant voice calls and SMS messaging using standardized LTE equipment marks an important step towards commercial voice over LTE deployments. Nokia Siemens Networks has carried out the world’s first voice calls in LTE networks using commercial, 3GPP-standardized user and network equipment. The success of the voice calls and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a style="color: #215670; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/press/press-releases/nokia-siemens-networks-rings-another-first-lte-3gpp-standardized-voice-calls"><span style="font-style: italic;">Source: Nokia Siemens Networks press release</span></a><br />
Successful IMS-compliant voice calls and SMS messaging using standardized LTE equipment marks an important step towards commercial voice over LTE deployments.</p>
<p>Nokia Siemens Networks has carried out the world’s first voice calls in LTE networks using commercial, 3GPP-standardized user and network equipment. The success of the voice calls and SMS texting demonstrate the viability of the One Voice approach to voice over LTE (VoLTE).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com/press/press-releases/nokia-siemens-networks-rings-another-first-lte-3gpp-standardized-voice-calls">Full Article&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.beyond4g.org/nokia-siemens-networks-rings-up-another-first-in-lte-with-3gpp-standardized-voice-calls-source/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

